Cited by 145Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Sex-related impairment of memory for emotional events with β-adrenergic blockade

Cahill, Larry, van Stegeren, Anda·2003·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

On the basis of recent evidence indicating a sex-related lateralization of amygdala function in memory for emotional events, together with substantial evidence suggesting hemispheric specialization in processing global (central) versus local (detail) aspects of a situation, and the established dependence of the amygdala's memory modulating function on beta-adrenergic receptor activation, we predicted differential effects of a beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist (propranolol) on long-term memory for an emotionally arousing story in men and women. Specifically, we predicted that, relative to placebo, propranolol would impair memory for information central to the story line, but not memory for peripheral story details in men. Conversely, propranolol would impair memory for peripheral details, but not for central information in women. Here we confirm this prediction with a novel analysis of data from our two published studies of propranolol's effect on memory for an emotionally arousing story. These findings demonstrate a sex-related impairment of memory for emotional information by beta-adrenergic blockade. Additionally, they provide support for the hypothesis that, in this paradigm, emotional arousal enhances long-term memory for central information in men via activation of right amygdala/hemisphere function, and enhances long-term memory for peripheral details in women via activation of left amygdala/hemisphere function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1074-7427(02)00019-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 145

Authors
Cahill, L., & van Stegeren, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Cahill, Larry
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
81-88
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103373335
Cited by
145
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
sex differences, emotional memory, beta-adrenergic blockade, propranolol, amygdala, hemispheric lateralization, emotional arousal, long-term memory
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Amygdala, Emotions, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Propranolol, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review