Cited by 260Sleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

A systematic review of non-pharmacological therapies for sleep problems in later life

Montgomery, P·2004·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

Sleep problems become more common with age, affect quality of life for individuals and their families, and can increase healthcare costs. Older people are often prescribed a range of drugs for their health problems, many of which have side effects. Side effects are just one reason why there is an argument to be made for clinical use of non-pharmacological treatments. This review considers the effectiveness of three interventions, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), bright light, and physical exercise. It considers sleep quality, duration and efficiency as primary outcome measures. Randomised controlled trials were selected where 80% or more of participants were over 60 and had a diagnosis of primary insomnia and where investigators had taken care to screen participants for dementia and/or depression. The data suggest a mild effect of CBT for sleep problems in older adults, best demonstrated for sleep maintenance insomnia. It may be that the provisions of 'top-up' or 'refresher' sessions of CBT training to improve durability of effect are worthy of investigation. Evidence of the efficacy of bright light and exercise were so limited that no conclusions about them can be reached as yet; however, in view of the promising results of bright light therapy in other populations with problems of sleep timing, further research into its effectiveness with older adults would seem justifiable. Exercise, though not appropriate for all in this population, may enhance sleep. Research involving exercise programmes designed with the elderly in mind is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1087-0792(03)00026-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 260

Authors
Montgomery, P.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Montgomery, P
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
47-62
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162124222
Cited by
260
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
non-pharmacological sleep intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, bright light therapy, physical activity, primary insomnia, sleep maintenance insomnia, sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep efficiency
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Middle Aged, Phototherapy, Sleep Wake Disorders, Exercise, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review