A systematic review of non-pharmacological therapies for sleep problems in later life
Abstract
Sleep problems become more common with age, affect quality of life for individuals and their families, and can increase healthcare costs. Older people are often prescribed a range of drugs for their health problems, many of which have side effects. Side effects are just one reason why there is an argument to be made for clinical use of non-pharmacological treatments. This review considers the effectiveness of three interventions, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), bright light, and physical exercise. It considers sleep quality, duration and efficiency as primary outcome measures. Randomised controlled trials were selected where 80% or more of participants were over 60 and had a diagnosis of primary insomnia and where investigators had taken care to screen participants for dementia and/or depression. The data suggest a mild effect of CBT for sleep problems in older adults, best demonstrated for sleep maintenance insomnia. It may be that the provisions of 'top-up' or 'refresher' sessions of CBT training to improve durability of effect are worthy of investigation. Evidence of the efficacy of bright light and exercise were so limited that no conclusions about them can be reached as yet; however, in view of the promising results of bright light therapy in other populations with problems of sleep timing, further research into its effectiveness with older adults would seem justifiable. Exercise, though not appropriate for all in this population, may enhance sleep. Research involving exercise programmes designed with the elderly in mind is needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No study has experimentally examined the longer-term impacts of exercise increases on objectively measured sleep architecture and subjective sleep quality in older persons with mild to moderate sleep complaints.
“However, no study has examined experimentally the longer-term impacts of exercise increases on objectively measured sleep architecture as well as subjective sleep quality in older persons with mild to moderate sleep complaints (6).”
From Effects of moderate-intensity exercise on polysomnographic and subjective sleep quality in older adults with mild to moderate sleep complaints (2008) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 260
- Authors
- Montgomery, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Montgomery, P
- ORCID
- Montgomery, P
- Venue
- Sleep Medicine Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-62
- ISSN
- 1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162124222
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- non-pharmacological sleep intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, bright light therapy, physical activity, primary insomnia, sleep maintenance insomnia, sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Humans, Middle Aged, Phototherapy, Sleep Wake Disorders, Exercise, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review