The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Facial attractiveness predicts longevity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Facial attractiveness has been found to be predictive of longevity and reproductive success.
“Facial attractiveness has also been found to be predictive of longevity and reproductive success [102,103].”
From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [102]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Henderson, J
- Venue
- Evolution and Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 351-356
- ISSN
- 1090-5138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016280703
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolution and Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- facial attractiveness, longevity, health perception, yearbook photographs, sexual selection, aging, physical appearance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
