The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aquatic toxicity from pulp and paper mill effluents: a review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review
Chen, Y., Cheng, J. J., & Creamer, K. S. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057 · Cited by 4,830
Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview
Pérez, J., Muñoz-Dorado, J., de la Rubia, T., & Martínez, J. (2002) · International Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s10123-002-0062-3 · Cited by 1,717
Review on recent developments on pulp and paper mill wastewater treatment
Kamali, M., & Khodaparast, Z. (2015) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.05.005 · Cited by 527
Pollutants released from the pulp paper industry: Aquatic toxicity and their health hazards
Singh, A. K., & Chandra, R. (2019) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.04.007 · Cited by 348
Biogas Production from Organic Waste: Recent Progress and Perspectives
Atelge, M. R., Krisa, D., Kumar, G., Eskicioglu, C., Nguyen, D. D., Chang, S. W., Atabani, A. E., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., & Unalan, S. (2020) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-018-00546-0 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Ali, M., & Sreekrishnan, T. R.
- Venue
- Advances in Environmental Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-196
- ISSN
- 1093-0191 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072809243
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aquatic toxicity from pulp and paper mill effluents: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1093-0191(00)00055-1
- The paper
- Ali, M., & Sreekrishnan, T. R. (2001). Aquatic toxicity from pulp and paper mill effluents: a review. Advances in Environmental Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1093-0191(00)00055-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
