Cited by 86Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsWaste Management and Environmental Impact

Prospects for enhancing carbon sequestration and reclamation of degraded lands with fossil-fuel combustion by-products

Palumbo, A.V., McCarthy, J.F., Amonette, J.E., Fisher, L.S., Wullschleger, S.D., Daniels, W.Lee·2004·Advances in Environmental Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1093-0191(02)00124-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential of coal combustion by-products in sequestering carbon and reclaiming degraded lands may be most fully realized when applied in conjunction with organic amendments such as mulch from biomass, biosolids or pulp and paper sludge.

    “In a review on the use of coal combustion by-products (fly ash, flue gas desulfurization by-product) in sequestering carbon and reclaiming degraded lands, Palumbo et al. (2004) indicated that their potential may be most fully realized when these inorganic by-products are applied in conjunction with organic amendments such as mulch from biomass, biosolids or pulp and paper sludge (Haering et al. 2”

    From The role of organic amendments in soil reclamation: A review (2012) · cites this paper as Palumbo et al. 2004

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 119 · Cited by 86

Authors
Palumbo, A. V., McCarthy, J. F., Amonette, J. E., Fisher, L. S., Wullschleger, S. D., & Daniels, W. L.
Affiliations
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Palumbo, A.V.
Venue
Advances in Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
8
Issue
3-4
Pages
425-438
ISSN
1093-0191 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148269536
Cited by
86
References
119
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • North Carolina State University
  • University of Arkansas
  • National Energy Technology Laboratory
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Waste Management and Environmental Impact
Keywords
carbon sequestration, land reclamation, degraded land, mine spoil, organic amendments, soil quality, soil organic carbon, biosolids, sewage sludge, soil acidity, nutritional deficiency, soil structure, moisture retention, plant growth promotion, atmospheric CO2 reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review