The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interspecies communication in oral biofilm: An ocean of information
Abstract
The diversity of signalling opportunities within microbial communities, and the significant role of these molecules in coordinating gene expression and promoting biofilm formation, has provided the impetus to investigate the potential of inhibitory analogues to disrupt these networks, thereby providing mechanisms to control or influence the development of dental plaque. Within the oral biofilms, resident bacterial cells interact with one another and exchange messages in the form of signalling molecules and metabolites. In this review article, our aim is to elaborate the role of this quorum sensing and their involvement in pathogenesis to decipher information that can be useful to target pathways to control diseases.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Primary colonizers are primarily gram‐positive cocci and rods, especially Streptococcus species, such as S salivarius.237”
From The oral microbiome: Role of key organisms and complex networks in oral health and disease (2021) · cites this paper as [237]
Citations
Cites
Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron
Chen, X., Schauder, S., Potier, N., DORSSELAER, A. V., Pelczer, I., Bassler, B. L., & Hughson, F. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415545a · Cited by 1,572
Watnick, P. I., & Kolter, R. (2000) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.182.10.2675-2679.2000 · Cited by 1,434
Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance
Kolenbrander, P. E., Palmer, R. J., Periasamy, S., & Jakubovics, N. S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2381 · Cited by 1,309
Chen, T., Yu, W.-H., Izard, J., Baranova, O. V., Lakshmanan, A., & Dewhirst, F. E. (2010) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baq013 · Cited by 1,162
Smith, J. M., & Harper, D. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198526841.001.0001 · Cited by 945
Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective
Keller, L., & Surette, M. G. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1383 · Cited by 826
Cross-species induction of luminescence in the quorum-sensing bacterium Vibrio harveyi
Bassler, B. L., Greenberg, E. P., & Stevens, A. M. (1997) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.179.12.4043-4045.1997 · Cited by 763
Interspecies communication in bacteria
Federle, M. J., & Bassler, B. L. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci20195 · Cited by 601
Dental plaque: biological significance of a biofilm and community life‐style
Marsh, P. (2005) · Journal Of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2005.00790.x · Cited by 599
Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm
Huang, R., Li, M., & Gregory, R. L. (2011) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.2.5.16140 · Cited by 493
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Coghlan A., 1996, Slime city, New Scientist, 15, 32
- Marsh PD, 2009, Oral microbiology
- 10.1038/nrmicro2381 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The oral microbiome: Role of key organisms and complex networks in oral health and disease
Sedghi, L., DiMassa, V., Harrington, A., Lynch, S. V., & Kapila, Y. L. (2021) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12393 · Cited by 755
Mystkowska, J., Niemirowicz-Laskowska, K., Łysik, D., Tokajuk, G., Dąbrowski, J. R., & Bucki, R. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19030743 · Cited by 102
Comparative pan genome analysis of oral Prevotella species implicated in periodontitis
Ibrahim, M., Subramanian, A., & Anishetty, S. (2017) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-017-0550-3 · Cited by 65
A review of co-culture models to study the oral microenvironment and disease
Mountcastle, S. E., Cox, S. C., Sammons, R. L., Jabbari, S., Shelton, R. M., & Kuehne, S. A. (2020) · Journal of Oral Microbiology · doi:10.1080/20002297.2020.1773122 · Cited by 62
Guardian genes ensuring subsistence of oral Streptococcus mutans
Shanmugam, K., Sarveswari, H. B., Udayashankar, A., Swamy, S. S., Pudipeddi, A., Shanmugam, T., Solomon, A. P., & Neelakantan, P. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040841x.2020.1796579 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Parashar, A., Parashar, S., Zingade, A., Gupta, S., & Sanikop, S.
- Affiliations
- KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN)
- Defence Research and Development Establishment (IN)
- People’s University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Parashar, Amit
- ORCID
- Gupta, Shikha
- Venue
- Oral Science International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 37-42
- ISSN
- 1348-8643 (ISSN-L)
- 1881-4204
- OpenAlex
- W2019500402
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oral Science International (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
- Keywords
- quorum sensing, dental plaque, interspecies communication, biofilm formation, bacterial pathogenesis, quorum sensing inhibitors, gene expression regulation, oral diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review