Cited by 14Temporomandibular Joint DisordersOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Relation of jaw sounds and kinematics visualized and quantified using 3-D computer animation

Leader, Joseph K., Boston, J.Robert, Rudy, Thomas E., Greco, Carol M., Zaki, Hussein S.·2003·Medical Engineering & Physics

Abstract

The management of jaw pain or temporomandibular disorders (TMD) has been controversial regarding temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds and their implication regarding TMD prognosis. 3-D computer animation was used to visualize and quantify the internal mechanics of natural mandibular motion synchronized with TMJ sounds. Mandibular movements of four TMD patients and two healthy subjects were recorded using CCD cameras and reflective markers. Sounds were recorded with electret microphones. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to create 3-D geometric models. Visualization of the internal anatomy, mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa, revealed that the condyle initially rotated within the fossa and then moved out of the fossa along, and well beyond, the articular eminence. Power in the opening sound recordings after the condyle moved out of the fossa was significantly greater than when the condyle was within the fossa (p<0.001). The louder opening sounds were often classified as TMJ clicks, implying that clicks occur after the condyle moves out of the fossa. The 3-D computer animation should help resolve the implication of TMJ sounds regarding TMD prognosis by providing visualization and quantization of the TMJ internal mechanics during sound production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1350-4533(02)00179-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Leader, J. K., Boston, J. R., Rudy, T. E., Greco, C. M., & Zaki, H. S.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Leader, Joseph K.
Venue
Medical Engineering & Physics
Published
2002-11-09
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
191-200
ISSN
  • 1350-4533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-4030
OpenAlex
W2152788345
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Engineering & Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01de007514-14)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01 DE07514-10)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
temporomandibular joint sounds, temporomandibular disorders, mandibular kinematics, mandibular condyle, glenoid fossa, articular eminence, jaw pain, acoustic power
MeSH terms
Adult, Auscultation, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Jaw Relation Record, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Sound, Statistics as Topic, Temporomandibular Joint, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Video Recording, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review