Seasonal variation of primary biological aerosol particles in the remote continental region of Lake Baikal/Siberia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The volume fraction of biological particles among particles larger than 0.2 μm during 1 year of measurements at a remote site in Siberia reaches 28 % on the average and at Mainz, Germany, the volume fraction amounts to 22 %.
“The volume fraction of biological particles among particles larger than 0.2 µm during 1 year of measurements at a remote site in Siberia reaches 28 % on the average and at Mainz, Germany, the volume fraction amounts to 22 % (Matthias-Maser et al., 2000).”
From Regional-scale simulations of fungal spore aerosols using an emission parameterization adapted to local measurements of fluorescent biological aerosol particles (2015) · cites this paper as Matthias-Maser et al., 2000
Both of these fractions agree well with simulated mass fractions of this study for comparable locations, although simulated concentrations given in this study are much lower than total PBAP number concentrations given in Matthias-Maser et al. (2000).
“Both of these fractions agree well with simulated mass fractions of this study for comparable locations, although simulated concentrations given in this study are much lower than total PBAP number concentrations given in Matthias-Maser et al. (2000).”
From Regional-scale simulations of fungal spore aerosols using an emission parameterization adapted to local measurements of fluorescent biological aerosol particles (2015) · cites this paper as Matthias-Maser et al., 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hummel, M., Hoose, C., Gallagher, M., Healy, D. A., Huffman, J. A., O'Connor, D., Pöschl, U., Pöhlker, C., Robinson, N. H., Schnaiter, M., et al. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-6127-2015 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Both of these fractions agree well with simulated mass fractions of this study for comparable locations, although simulated concentrations given in this study are much lower than total PBAP number concentrations given in Matthias-Maser et al. (2000).”
BackgroundResultInfluential
- Authors
- Matthias-Maser, S., Obolkin, V, Khodzer, T., & Jaenicke, R.
- Affiliations
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- ORCID
- Jaenicke, R
- Venue
- Atmospheric Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 3805-3811
- ISSN
- 1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984375091
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Atmospheric Environment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Keywords
- primary biological aerosol particles, seasonal variation, Lake Baikal, Siberia, single-particle analysis, aerosol size distribution, phenology, giant particles, aerosol number concentration, aerosol volume concentration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
