The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benchmarking stiff ode solvers for atmospheric chemistry problems-I. implicit vs explicit
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In many applications of atmospheric transport-chemistry problems, a major task is the numerical integration of the stiff systems of ordinary differential equations describing the chemical transformations. This paper presents a comprehensive numerical comparison between five dedicated explicit and four implicit solvers for a set of seven benchmark problems from actual applications. The implicit solvers use sparse matrix techniques to economize on the numerical linear algebra overhead. As a result they are often more efficient than the dedicated explicit ones, particularly when approximately two or more figures of accuracy are required. In most test cases, sparse RODAs, a Rosenbrock solver, came out as most competitive in the 1% error region. Of the dedicated explicit solvers, TWOSTEP came out as best. When less than 1% accuracy is aimed at, this solver performs very efficiently for tropospheric gas-phase problems. However, like all other dedicated explicit solvers, it cannot efficiently deal with gas-liquid phase chemistry. The results presented may constitute a guide for atmospheric modelers to select a suitable integrator based on the type and dimension of their chemical mechanism and on the desired level of accuracy. Furthermore, we would like to consider this paper an open invitation for other groups to add new representative test problems to those described here and to benchmark their numerical algorithms in our standard computational environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Young, P. J., Naik, V., Fiore, A. M., Gaudel, A., Guo, J., Lin, M. Y., Neu, J. L., Parrish, D. D., Rieder, H. E., Schnell, J. L., et al. (2018) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.265 · Cited by 444
The kinetic preprocessor KPP-a software environment for solving chemical kinetics
Damian, V., Sandu, A., Damian, M., Potra, F., & Carmichael, G. R. (2002) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0098-1354(02)00128-x · Cited by 438
Self-citationTropospheric Ozone Assessment Report
Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y. F., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R. G., Deushi, M., et al. (2020) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.2020.034 · Cited by 239
Johnstone, C. P., Güdel, M., Lammer, H., & Kislyakova, K. G. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832776 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandu, A., Verwer, J. G., Van Loon, M., Carmichael, G. R., Potra, F. A., Dabdub, D., & Seinfeld, J. H.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3151-3166
- ISSN
- 1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992490727
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benchmarking stiff ode solvers for atmospheric chemistry problems-I. implicit vs explicit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00059-9
- The paper
- Sandu, A., Verwer, J. G., Van Loon, M., Carmichael, G. R., Potra, F. A., Dabdub, D., & Seinfeld, J. H. (1997). Benchmarking stiff ode solvers for atmospheric chemistry problems-I. implicit vs explicit. Atmospheric Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00059-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.