The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breeding by Design
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes
Johnson, G. C. L., Esposito, L., Barratt, B. J., Smith, A. N., Heward, J., Di Genova, G., Ueda, H., Cordell, H. J., Eaves, I. A., Dudbridge, F., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1001-233 · Cited by 1,174
Cited by
Ribaut, J.-M., & Ragot, M. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erl214 · Cited by 365
Prohens, J., Gramazio, P., Plazas, M., Dempewolf, H., Kilian, B., Díez, M. J., Fita, A., Herraiz, F. J., Rodríguez-Burruezo, A., Soler, S., et al. (2017) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-017-1938-9 · Cited by 206
Mapping As You Go: An Effective Approach for Marker‐Assisted Selection of Complex Traits
Podlich, D. W., Winkler, C. R., & Cooper, M. (2004) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.1560 · Cited by 169
QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley
Yin, X. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri090 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Peleman, J. D., & van der Voort, J. R.
- Venue
- Trends in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 330-334
- ISSN
- 1360-1385 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089506586
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breeding by Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00134-1
- The paper
- Peleman, J. D., & van der Voort, J. R. (2003). Breeding by Design. Trends in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00134-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
