The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A two-way window on face recognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Depersonalization and the experiential component of DMS are reported in as-if vocabulary.
“they are reported in “as if” vocabulary”
From Pain Asymbolia as Depersonalization for Pain Experience. An Interoceptive Active Inference Account (2020) · cites this paper as Breen et al., 2001
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Ellis, 2001, Capgras delusion: a window on face recognition, Trends Cognit. Sci., 5, 149, 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01620-X · DOI
- Breen, 2000, Models of face recognition and delusional misidentification: a critical review, Cognit. Neuropsychol., 17, 55, 10.1080/026432900380481 · DOI
- Ellis, 1997, Reduced autonomic responses to faces in Capgras delusion, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B, 264, 1085, 10.1098/rspb.1997.0150 · DOI
- Hirstein, 1997, Capgras syndrome: a novel probe for understanding the neural representation of the identity and familiarity of persons, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B, 264, 437, 10.1098/rspb.1997.0062 · DOI
- Bauer, 1984, Autonomic recognition of names and faces: a neuropsychological application of the Guilty Knowledge Test, Neuropsychologia, 22, 457, 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90040-X · DOI
- Tranel, 1985, Knowledge without awareness: an autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics, Science, 228, 1453, 10.1126/science.4012303 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pain Asymbolia as Depersonalization for Pain Experience. An Interoceptive Active Inference Account
Gerrans, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.523710 · Cited by 43
“It is actually a striking parallel between disorders of depersonalization and the experiential (or first stage as it is sometimes called) component of DMS that they are reported in “as if ” vocabulary (Breen et al., 2001; Brighetti et al., 2007; Coltheart et al., 2010).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Breen, N., Coltheart, M., & Caine, D.
- Affiliations
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 234-235
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059791349
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Keywords
- face recognition (cognition), face perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
