The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating perception in driving simulation experiments
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision
Lee, D. N. (1976) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p050437 · Cited by 2,094
Perception of self-motion from visual flow
Lappe, M., Bremmer, F., & van den Berg, A. V. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01364-9 · Cited by 430
Cited by
Konstantopoulos, P., Chapman, P., & Crundall, D. (2010) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.022 · Cited by 451
Gold, C., Körber, M., Lechner, D., & Bengler, K. (2016) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720816634226 · Cited by 440
Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes
Ho, C., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2005) · Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.05.002 · Cited by 344
Driving simulator for speed research on two-lane rural roads
Bella, F. (2008) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.10.015 · Cited by 303
Louveton, N., McCall, R., Koenig, V., Avanesov, T., & Engel, T. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.012 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Kemeny, A., & Panerai, F.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-37
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086641568
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating perception in driving simulation experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00011-6
- The paper
- Kemeny, A., & Panerai, F. (2003). Evaluating perception in driving simulation experiments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00011-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
