CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 69Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Object-form topology in the ventral temporal lobe

Haxby, James V, Ishai, Alumit, Chao, Linda L, Ungerleider, Leslie G, Martin, Alex·2000·Trends in Cognitive Sciences
DOI 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01423-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01423-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 69

Authors
Haxby, J. V., Ishai, A., Chao, L. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Martin, A.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Haxby, James V
ORCID
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
3-4
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01423-0
OpenAlex
W2075341242
Cited by
69
References
11
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 23 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
ventral temporal cortex, object recognition, distributed representations, ventral stream, object form

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review