Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

sdsm — a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts

Wilby, R.L, Dawson, C.W, Barrow, E.M·2002·Environmental Modelling & Software

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1364-8152(01)00060-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method

    Rubinstein, R. Y., & Kroese, D. P. (2016) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118631980 · Cited by 3,356 · cited 1×

    “Following the method of Rubinstein (1981), a pseudo random number generator reproduces values from a normal distribution with standard deviation equal to the calibration standard error.”
    Method

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,438

Metadata

Authors
Wilby, R. L., Dawson, C. W., & Barrow, E. M.
Venue
Environmental Modelling & Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
145-157
ISSN
1364-8152 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122974524
Cited by
1,438
References
1
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: sdsm — a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1364-8152(01)00060-3
The paper
Wilby, R. L., Dawson, C. W., & Barrow, E. M. (2002). sdsm — a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environmental Modelling & Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-8152(01)00060-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.