Therapeutic application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a non-invasive means of electrically stimulating neurons in the human cerebral cortex, is able to modify neuronal activity locally and at distant sites when delivered in series or trains of pulses. Data from stimulation of the motor cortex suggest that the type of effect on the excitability of the cortical network depends on the frequency of stimulation. These data, as well as results from studies in rodents, have been generalized across brain areas and species to provide rationales for using repetitive TMS (rTMS) to treat various brain disorders, most notably depression. Research into clinical applications for TMS remains active and has the potential to provide useful data, but, to date, the results of blinded, sham-controlled trials do not provide clear evidence of beneficial effects that replace or even match the effectiveness of conventional treatments in any disorder. In this review, we discuss the clinical and scientific bases for using rTMS as treatment, and review the results of trials in psychiatric and neurological disorders to date.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Repetitive TMS has been shown to modify neuronal activity locally and distally.
“The repetitive application of TMS (rTMS), has been shown to modify neuronal activity locally and distally (Wassermann & Lisanby, 2001).”
From Investigation of neurobiological responses to theta burst stimulation during recovery from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) (2023) · cites this paper as Wassermann & Lisanby, 2001
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 125 · Cited by 601
- Authors
- Wassermann, E. M., & Lisanby, S. H.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wassermann, Eric M
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1367-1377
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107184087
- Cited by
- 601
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, depression, motor cortex excitability, stimulation frequency, non-invasive brain stimulation, mental illness, neurological disorders, treatment efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depressive Disorder, Disease Models, Animal, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Motor Cortex, Nerve Net, Parkinson Disease, Rodentia, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review