Cited by 601Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

Therapeutic application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review

Wassermann, Eric M, Lisanby, Sarah H·2001·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a non-invasive means of electrically stimulating neurons in the human cerebral cortex, is able to modify neuronal activity locally and at distant sites when delivered in series or trains of pulses. Data from stimulation of the motor cortex suggest that the type of effect on the excitability of the cortical network depends on the frequency of stimulation. These data, as well as results from studies in rodents, have been generalized across brain areas and species to provide rationales for using repetitive TMS (rTMS) to treat various brain disorders, most notably depression. Research into clinical applications for TMS remains active and has the potential to provide useful data, but, to date, the results of blinded, sham-controlled trials do not provide clear evidence of beneficial effects that replace or even match the effectiveness of conventional treatments in any disorder. In this review, we discuss the clinical and scientific bases for using rTMS as treatment, and review the results of trials in psychiatric and neurological disorders to date.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00585-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 125 · Cited by 601

Authors
Wassermann, E. M., & Lisanby, S. H.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wassermann, Eric M
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
112
Issue
8
Pages
1367-1377
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107184087
Cited by
601
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, depression, motor cortex excitability, stimulation frequency, non-invasive brain stimulation, mental illness, neurological disorders, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depressive Disorder, Disease Models, Animal, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Motor Cortex, Nerve Net, Parkinson Disease, Rodentia, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review