Cited by 65Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic EffectsPeripheral Nerve DisordersNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Establishment of standard values for the latency, interval and amplitude parameters of tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs)

Miura, Takaaki, Sonoo, Masahiro, Shimizu, Teruo·2003·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Objective To establish standard values for tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Methods We examined SEPs following left tibial nerve stimulation in 65 normal subjects of various ages, and performed multiple regression analysis using height, age, (age-20)(2) and gender as predictor variables. We objectively selected the latency or interval parameters with less intersubject variability as the standard parameters for evaluation. Results Among 3 cortical bipolar derivations investigated, the Cz'-Cc lead gave a more constant and stable P38 component than the Cz'-Fz or Ci-Cc lead. The latencies of the N8o (N8 onset) of the popliteal potential, P15 (P15 peak) in the contralateral iliac crest-ipsilateral greater trochanter lead, N21, N30 and P38o/P38 in the Cz'-Cc lead, as well as the intervals between these components were selected as standard parameters. P15 was easily identified in all of the subjects and is expected to be a new parameter to evaluate the proximal segment of the tibial nerve. The amplitudes of P15 and the other components were also evaluated. We present nomograms for the normal limit values of each parameter. Conclusions We present a thorough set of standard values for tibial SEPs where the subject factors were fully considered, and which is easily applicable to clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00094-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miura, T., Sonoo, M., & Shimizu, T.
Affiliations
Teikyo University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sonoo, Masahiro
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
114
Issue
7
Pages
1367-1378
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983728374
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (14570621)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
tibial nerve, somatosensory evoked potentials, reference values, evoked potential latency, evoked potential amplitude, age and height effects, nomogram
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Body Height, Electric Stimulation, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Conduction, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, Tibial Nerve, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review