Cited by 56Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation

The effect of muscle energy technique on gross trunk range of motion

Open access
Lenehan, Karen L, Fryer, Gary, McLaughlin, Patrick·2003·Journal of Osteopathic Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1443-8461(03)80004-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PIR and MR are highly effective in improving musculoskeletal function, increasing range of motion, alleviating pain, and decreasing muscle stiffness in trunk and limbs.

    “The reports indicate that PIR and MR are highly effective in improving the functioning of the musculoskeletal system, increasing the range of motion in the joints, alleviating pain and decreasing muscle stiffness.”

    From The Application of Manual Techniques in Masticatory Muscles Relaxation as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Conclusion reports that muscle energy technique (MET) increased restricted trunk rotation in asymptomatic subjects. The study does not establish that PIR and MR are highly effective across the trunk and limbs, or that they alleviate pain or decrease muscle stiffness; the Conclusion calls for future research using pain and disability measures. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reports on trunk and limbs soft-tissue therapy indicate a significant effect of PIR on minimization of pain and increasing range of motion in joints.

    “These reports indicate a significant effect of PIR on the minimization of pain and increasing the range of motion in the joints [16,27,32,33,34], accompanied by a decrease in muscle electrical activity [35].”

    From The Application of Manual Techniques in Masticatory Muscles Relaxation as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Abstract and Conclusion (page numbers unavailable) report a significant increase in restricted trunk rotation after muscle energy technique in asymptomatic volunteers. The paper did not test pain reduction or limb-joint motion, and it does not explicitly identify the intervention as PIR. The Conclusion calls for future research using pain indicators in symptomatic subjects. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Schenk R, Adelman K, Rousselle J, (1994). The Effects of Muscle Energy Technique on Cervical Range of Motion. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy. 1994; 2(4): 149 -155.
  2. Schenk R, MacDiarmid A, Rousselle J, The Effects of Muscle Energy Technique on Lumbar Range of Motion. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy. 1997; 5(4): 179 -183.
  3. Mitchell FL, Jr. The Muscle Energy Manual. Volume 1. East Lansing, Michigan: MET Press; 1995:
  4. Denslow JS, Korr IM, Krems AD. Quantitative Studies of Chronic Facilitation in Human Motorneuron Pools. American Journal of Physiology. 1947. In: The Collected Works of JS Denslow, 1993 Year Book, Indiana: American Academy of Osteopathy.
  5. Lederman E. Facilitated Segments: a Critical Review. British Journal of Osteopathy. 2000; 22:7 -10.
  6. Fryer G. Muscle Energy Concepts -A Need for a Change. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2000; 3(2):54 -59
  7. Taylor DC, Brooks DE, Ryan JB. Viscoelastic Characteristics of Muscle: Passive stretching versus Muscular Contractions. Medicine & Science in Sport and Exercise. 1997; 29(12):1619 - 1624
  8. Troke M, Moore AP, Maillardet FJ, Hough A, & Cheek E. A New, Comprehensive Normative Database of Lumbar Spine Ranges of Motion. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2001;15: 371-379.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenehan, K. L., Fryer, G., & McLaughlin, P.
Affiliations
Victoria University (AU)
Corresponding author
Fryer, Gary
Venue
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
13-18
ISSN
1443-8461 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015318219
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Osteopathic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Keywords
muscle energy technique, thoracic spine, trunk rotation, range of motion, osteopathic manipulative treatment, asymptomatic volunteers, single-session intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review