The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon ion radiotherapy in Japan: an assessment of 20 years of clinical experience
Open accessAbstract
Charged particle therapy is generally regarded as cutting-edge technology in oncology. Many proton therapy centres are active in the USA, Europe, and Asia, but only a few centres use heavy ions, even though these ions are much more effective than x-rays owing to the special radiobiological properties of densely ionising radiation. The National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) Chiba, Japan, has been treating cancer with high-energy carbon ions since 1994. So far, more than 8000 patients have had this treatment at NIRS, and the centre thus has by far the greatest experience in carbon ion treatment worldwide. A panel of radiation oncologists, radiobiologists, and medical physicists from the USA and Europe recently completed peer review of the carbon ion therapy at NIRS. The review panel had access to the latest developments in treatment planning and beam delivery and to all updated clinical data produced at NIRS. A detailed comparison with the most advanced results obtained with x-rays or protons in Europe and the USA was then possible. In addition to those tumours for which carbon ions are known to produce excellent results, such as bone and soft-tissue sarcoma of the skull base, head and neck, and pelvis, promising data were obtained for other tumours, such as locally recurrent rectal cancer and pancreatic cancer. The most serious impediment to the worldwide spread of heavy ion therapy centres is the high initial capital cost. The 20 years of clinical experience at NIRS can help guide strategic decisions on the design and construction of new heavy ion therapy centres.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kumar, S., Suman, S., Fornace, A. J., & Datta, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1807522115 · Cited by 81
Applied nuclear physics at the new high-energy particle accelerator facilities
Durante, M., Golubev, A., Park, W.-Y., & Trautmann, C. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.004 · Cited by 72
Self-citationFurusawa, Y., Nakano-Aoki, M., Matsumoto, Y., Hirayama, R., Kobayashi, A., & Konishi, T. (2017) · Journal of Radiation Research · doi:10.1093/jrr/rrx030 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamada, T., Tsujii, H., Blakely, E. A., Debus, J., De Neve, W., Durante, M., Jäkel, O., Mayer, R., Orecchia, R., Pötter, R., Vatnitsky, S., & Chu, W. T.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e93-e100
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152002544
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon ion radiotherapy in Japan: an assessment of 20 years of clinical experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70412-7
- The paper
- Kamada, T., Tsujii, H., Blakely, E. A., Debus, J., De Neve, W., Durante, M., Jäkel, O., Mayer, R., Orecchia, R., Pötter, R., Vatnitsky, S., & Chu, W. T. (2015). Carbon ion radiotherapy in Japan: an assessment of 20 years of clinical experience. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70412-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.