Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 950

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Sun, Ying, Li, Wen-Fei, Chen, Nian-Yong, Zhang, Ning, Hu, Guo-Qing, Xie, Fang-Yun, Sun, Yan, Chen, Xiao-Zhong, Li, Jin-Gao, Zhu, Xiao-Dong, Hu, Chao-Su, Xu, Xiang-Ying, Chen, Yuan-Yuan, Hu, Wei-Han, Guo, Ling, Mo, Hao-Yuan, Chen, Lei, Mao, Yan-Ping, Sun, Rui, Ai, Ping, Liang, Shao-Bo, Long, Guo-Xian, Zheng, Bao-Min, Feng, Xing-Lai, Gong, Xiao-Chang, Li, Ling, Shen, Chun-Ying, Xu, Jian-Yu, Guo, Ying, Chen, Yu-Ming, Zhang, Fan, Lin, Li, Tang, Ling-Long, Liu, Meng-Zhong, Ma, Jun·2016·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND The value of adding cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel (TPF) induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma is unclear. We aimed to compare TPF induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in a suitably powered trial. METHODS We did an open-label, phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial at ten institutions in China. Patients with previously untreated, stage III-IVB (except T3-4N0) nasopharyngeal carcinoma, aged 18-59 years without severe comorbidities were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone (three cycles of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks, concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy). Induction chemotherapy was three cycles of intravenous docetaxel (60 mg/m2 on day 1), intravenous cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), and continuous intravenous fluorouracil (600 mg/m2 per day from day 1 to day 5) every 3 weeks before concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Randomisation was by a computer-generated random number code with a block size of four, stratified by treatment centre and disease stage (III or IV). Treatment allocation was not masked. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival calculated from randomisation to locoregional failure, distant failure, or death from any cause; required sample size was 476 patients (238 per group). We did efficacy analyses in our intention-to-treat population. The follow-up is ongoing; in this report, we present the 3-year survival results and acute toxic effects. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01245959. FINDINGS Between March 1, 2011, and Aug 22, 2013, 241 patients were assigned to induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and 239 to concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. After a median follow-up of 45 months (IQR 38-49), 3-year failure-free survival was 80% (95% CI 75-85) in the induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy group and 72% (66-78) in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone group (hazard ratio 0·68, 95% CI 0·48-0·97; p=0·034). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events during treatment in the 239 patients in the induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy group versus the 238 patients in concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone group were neutropenia (101 [42%] vs 17 [7%]), leucopenia (98 [41%] vs 41 [17%]), and stomatitis (98 [41%] vs 84 [35%]). INTERPRETATION Addition of TPF induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly improved failure-free survival in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with acceptable toxicity. Long-term follow-up is required to determine long-term efficacy and toxicities. FUNDING Shenzhen Main Luck Pharmaceuticals Inc, Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program (2007037), National Science and Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period (2014BAI09B10), Health & Medical Collaborative Innovation Project of Guangzhou City (201400000001), Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province (2013B020400004), and The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0902000).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30410-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 950

Metadata

Authors
Sun, Y., Li, W.-F., Chen, N.-Y., Zhang, N., Hu, G.-Q., Xie, F.-Y., Sun, Y., Chen, X.-Z., Li, J.-G., Zhu, X.-D., Hu, C.-S., Xu, X.-Y., Chen, Y.-Y., Hu, W.-H., Guo, L., Mo, H.-Y., Chen, L., Mao, Y.-P., Sun, R., Ai, P., Liang, S.-B., Long, G.-X., Zheng, B.-M., Feng, X.-L., Gong, X.-C., Li, L., Shen, C.-Y., Xu, J.-Y., Guo, Y., Chen, Y.-M., Zhang, F., Lin, L., Tang, L.-L., Liu, M.-Z., & Ma, J.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
1509-1520
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2526747727
Cited by
950
References
3
FWCI
72.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30410-7
The paper
Sun, Y., Li, W.-F., Chen, N.-Y., Zhang, N., Hu, G.-Q., Xie, F.-Y., Sun, Y., Chen, X.-Z., Li, J.-G., Zhu, X.-D., Hu, C.-S., Xu, X.-Y., Chen, Y.-Y., Hu, W.-H., Guo, L., Mo, H.-Y., Chen, L., Mao, Y.-P., Sun, R., . . . Ma, J. (2016). Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30410-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.