The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: For many years, first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma has been doxorubicin. This study compared gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. METHODS: on day 8 every 3 weeks. Treatment was assigned using a minimisation algorithm incorporating a random element. Randomisation was stratified by age (≤18 years vs >18 years) and histological subtype. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive and progression free at 24 weeks in the intention-to-treat population. Adherence to treatment and toxicity were analysed in the safety population, consisting of all patients who received at least one dose of their randomised treatment. The trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials (EudraCT) database (no 2009-014907-29) and with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry (ISRCTN07742377), and is now closed to patient entry. FINDINGS: Between Dec 3, 2010, and Jan 20, 2014, 257 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (129 to doxorubicin and 128 to gemcitabine and docetaxel). Median follow-up was 22 months (IQR 15·7-29·3). The proportion of patients alive and progression free at 24 weeks did not differ between those who received doxorubicin versus those who received gemcitabine and docetaxel (46·3% [95% CI 37·5-54·6] vs 46·4% [37·5-54·8]); median progression-free survival (23·3 weeks [95% CI 19·6-30·4] vs 23·7 weeks [18·1-20·0]; hazard ratio [HR] for progression-free survival 1·28, 95% CI 0·99-1·65, p=0·06). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (32 [25%] of 128 patients who received doxorubicin and 25 [20%] of 126 patients who received gemcitabine and docetaxel), febrile neutropenia (26 [20%] and 15 [12%]), fatigue (eight [6%] and 17 [14%]), oral mucositis (18 [14%] and two [2%]), and pain (ten [8%] and 13 [10%]). The three most common serious adverse events, representing 111 (39%) of all 285 serious adverse events recorded, were febrile neutropenia (27 [17%] of 155 serious adverse events in patients who received doxorubicin and 15 [12%] of 130 serious adverse events in patients who received gemcitabine and docetaxel, fever (18 [12%] and 19 [15%]), and neutropenia (22 [14%] and ten [8%]). 154 (60%) of 257 patients died in the intention-to-treat population: 74 (57%) of 129 patients in the doxorubicin group and 80 (63%) of 128 in the gemcitabine and docetaxel group. No deaths were related to the treatment, but two deaths were due to a combination of disease progression and treatment. INTERPRETATION: Doxorubicin should remain the standard first-line treatment for most patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. These results provide evidence for clinicians to consider with their patients when selecting first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, Sarcoma UK, and Clinical Trial Unit Kantonsspital St Gallen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Casali, P. G., Abecassis, N., Bauer, S., Biagini, R., Bielack, S., Bonvalot, S., Boukovinas, I., Bovee, J. V. M. G., Brodowicz, T., Broto, J. M., et al. (2018) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy096 · Cited by 1,614
Self-citationJudson, I., Verweij, J., Gelderblom, H., Hartmann, J. T., Schöffski, P., Blay, J.-Y., Kerst, J. M., Sufliarsky, J., Whelan, J., Hohenberger, P., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70063-4 · Cited by 1,183
Self-citationMaki, R. G., Wathen, J. K., Patel, S. R., Priebat, D. A., Okuno, S. H., Samuels, B., Fanucchi, M., Harmon, D. C., Schuetze, S. M., Reinke, D., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.10.4117 · Cited by 742
Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in Patients With Unresectable Leiomyosarcoma: Results of a Phase II Trial
Hensley, M. L., Maki, R., Venkatraman, E., Geller, G., Lovegren, M., Aghajanian, C., Sabbatini, P., Tong, W., Barakat, R., & Spriggs, D. R. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.11.050 · Cited by 683
(2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu254 · Cited by 656
Hensley, M. L., Blessing, J. A., DeGeest, K., Abulafia, O., Rose, P. G., & Homesley, H. D. (2008) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.02.024 · Cited by 365
Hensley, M. L., Blessing, J. A., Mannel, R., & Rose, P. G. (2008) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.03.010 · Cited by 311
Tap, W. D., Papai, Z., Van Tine, B. A., Attia, S., Ganjoo, K. N., Jones, R. L., Schuetze, S., Reed, D., Chawla, S. P., Riedel, R. F., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30381-9 · Cited by 302
Lorigan, P., Verweij, J., Papai, Z., Rodenhuis, S., Le Cesne, A., Leahy, M. G., Radford, J. A., Van Glabbeke, M. M., Kirkpatrick, A., Hogendoorn, P. C. W., et al. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.09.7717 · Cited by 256
Self-citation
Cited by
Gronchi, A., Miah, A. B., Dei Tos, A. P., Abecassis, N., Bajpai, J., Bauer, S., Biagini, R., Bielack, S., Blay, J. Y., Bolle, S., et al. (2021) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.07.006 · Cited by 1,115
Self-citationD'Angelo, S. P., Mahoney, M. R., Van Tine, B. A., Atkins, J., Milhem, M. M., Jahagirdar, B. N., Antonescu, C. R., Horvath, E., Tap, W. D., Schwartz, G. K., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30006-8 · Cited by 759
Pollack, S. M., Redman, M. W., Baker, K. K., Wagner, M. J., Schroeder, B. A., Loggers, E. T., Trieselmann, K., Copeland, V. C., Zhang, S., Black, G., et al. (2020) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3689 · Cited by 142
Pilot study of bempegaldesleukin in combination with nivolumab in patients with metastatic sarcoma
D’Angelo, S. P., Richards, A. L., Conley, A. P., Woo, H. J., Dickson, M. A., Gounder, M., Kelly, C., Keohan, M. L., Movva, S., Thornton, K., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30874-8 · Cited by 60
Seligson, N. D., Chen, J. L., Goodrich, A. C., Van Tine, B. A., Campbell, J. D., Richards, A. L., Antonescu, C. R., Liebner, D. A., Milhem, M. M., Streicher, H., et al. (2024) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1136/jitc-2024-009472 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Seddon, B., Strauss, S. J., Whelan, J., Leahy, M., Woll, P. J., Cowie, F., Rothermundt, C., Wood, Z., Benson, C., Ali, N., Marples, M., Veal, G. J., Jamieson, D., Küver, K., Tirabosco, R., Forsyth, S., Nash, S., Dehbi, H.-M., & Beare, S.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1397-1410
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2752560124
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 33.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30622-8
- The paper
- Seddon, B., Strauss, S. J., Whelan, J., Leahy, M., Woll, P. J., Cowie, F., Rothermundt, C., Wood, Z., Benson, C., Ali, N., Marples, M., Veal, G. J., Jamieson, D., Küver, K., Tirabosco, R., Forsyth, S., Nash, S., Dehbi, H.-M., & Beare, S. (2017). Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30622-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.