The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
Background Although women with endometrial cancer generally have a favourable prognosis, those with high-risk disease features are at increased risk of recurrence. The PORTEC-3 trial was initiated to investigate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy during and after radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy) versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. Methods PORTEC-3 was an open-label, international, randomised, phase 3 trial involving 103 centres in six clinical trials collaborating in the Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup. Eligible women had high-risk endometrial cancer with FIGO 2009 stage I, endometrioid-type grade 3 with deep myometrial invasion or lymph-vascular space invasion (or both), endometrioid-type stage II or III, or stage I to III with serous or clear cell histology. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions given on 5 days per week) or radiotherapy and chemotherapy (consisting of two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m 2 given during radiotherapy, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 ) using a biased-coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage of cancer, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and failure-free survival. We used the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis for final analysis by intention to treat and adjusted for stratification factors. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013, after achieving complete accrual; follow-up is ongoing. PORTEC-3 is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14387080, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138. Results 686 women were enrolled between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013. 660 eligible patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 330 were assigned to chemoradiotherapy and 330 were assigned to radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 60·2 months (IQR 48·1–73·1). 5-year overall survival was 81·8% (95% CI 77·5–86·2) with chemoradiotherapy versus 76·7% (72·1–81·6) with radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·54–1·06; p=0·11); 5-year failure-free survival was 75·5% (95% CI 70·3–79·9) versus 68·6% (63·1–73·4; HR 0·71, 95% CI 0·53–0·95; p=0·022). Grade 3 or worse adverse events during treatment occurred in 198 (60%) of 330 who received chemoradiotherapy versus 41 (12%) of 330 patients who received radiotherapy (p<0·0001). Neuropathy (grade 2 or worse) persisted significantly more often after chemoradiotherapy than after radiotherapy (20 [8%] women vs one [1%] at 3 years; p<0·0001). Most deaths were due to endometrial cancer; in four patients (two in each group), the cause of death was uncertain. One death in the radiotherapy group was due to either disease progression or late treatment complications; three deaths (two in the chemoradiotherapy group and one in the radiotherapy group) were due to either intercurrent disease or late treatment-related toxicity. Interpretation Adjuvant chemotherapy given during and after radiotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer did not improve 5-year overall survival, although it did increase failure-free survival. Women with high-risk endometrial cancer should be individually counselled about this combined treatment. Continued follow-up is needed to evaluate long-term survival. Funding Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant and Cancer Australia, L'Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum Creatinine
Cockcroft, D. W., & Gault, H. (1976) · Nephron · doi:10.1159/000180580 · Cited by 15,309
Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi‐state models
Putter, H., Fiocco, M., & Geskus, R. B. (2007) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2712 · Cited by 2,440
Self-citation(2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61766-3 · Cited by 1,801
Panici, P. B., Basile, S., Maneschi, F., Lissoni, A. A., Signorelli, M., Scambia, G., Angioli, R., Tateo, S., Mangili, G., Katsaros, D., et al. (2008) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djn397 · Cited by 1,544
Self-citationESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Colombo, N., Creutzberg, C., Amant, F., Bosse, T., González-Martín, A., Ledermann, J., Marth, C., Nout, R., Querleu, D., Mirza, M. R., et al. (2016) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv484 · Cited by 1,386
Self-citationThe Analysis of Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials
Pocock, S. J., Geller, N. L., & Tsiatis, A. A. (1987) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531989 · Cited by 524
Di Maio, M., Gallo, C., Leighl, N. B., Piccirillo, M. C., Daniele, G., Nuzzo, F., Gridelli, C., Gebbia, V., Ciardiello, F., De Placido, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.57.9334 · Cited by 497
Stelloo, E., Bosse, T., Nout, R. A., MacKay, H. J., Church, D. N., Nijman, H. W., Leary, A., Edmondson, R. J., Powell, M. E., Crosbie, E. J., et al. (2015) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2015.43 · Cited by 486
Self-citationBosse, T., Peters, E. E. M., Creutzberg, C. L., Jurgenliemk-Schulz, I. M., Jobsen, J. J., Mens, J. W., Lutgens, L. C. H. W., van der Steen‐Banasik, E. M., Smit, V. T. H. B. M., & Nout, R. A. (2015) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.015 · Cited by 451
Self-citationHögberg, T., Signorelli, M., Oliveira, C., Fossati, R., Lissoni, A. A., Sorbe, B., Andersson, H., Grénman, S., Lundgren, C., Rosenberg, P., et al. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.06.002 · Cited by 451
Self-citation
Cited by
ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma
Concin, N., Matias-Guiu, X., Vergote, I., Cibula, D., Mirza, M. R., Marnitz, S., Ledermann, J., Bosse, T., Chargari, C., Fagotti, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230 · Cited by 1,989
Self-citationLeón-Castillo, A., de Boer, S. M., Powell, M. E., Mileshkin, L. R., Mackay, H. J., Leary, A., Nijman, H. W., Singh, N., Pollock, P. M., Bessette, P., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.20.00549 · Cited by 855
Self-citationLadbury, C., Zarinshenas, R., Semwal, H., Tam, A., Vaidehi, N., Rodin, A. S., Liu, A., Glaser, S., Salgia, R., & Amini, A. (2022) · Translational Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tcr-22-1626 · Cited by 86
O'Sullivan Greene, E., & Shiely, F. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.014 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- de Boer, S. M., Powell, M. E., Mileshkin, L., Katsaros, D., Bessette, P., Haie-Meder, C., Ottevanger, P. B., Ledermann, J. A., Khaw, P., Colombo, A., Fyles, A., Baron, M.-H., Jürgenliemk-Schulz, I. M., Kitchener, H. C., Nijman, H. W., Wilson, G., Brooks, S., Carinelli, S., Provencher, D., Hanzen, C., Lutgens, L. C. H. W., Smit, V. T. H. B. M., Singh, N., Do, V., D'Amico, R., Nout, R. A., Feeney, A., Verhoeven-Adema, K. W., Putter, H., Creutzberg, C. L., McCormack, M., Whitmarsh, K., Allerton, R., Gregory, D., Symonds, P., Hoskin, P. J., Adusumalli, M., Anand, A., Wade, R., Stewart, A., Taylor, W., Kruitwagen, R. F. P. M., Hollema, H., Pras, E., Snyers, A., Stalpers, L., Jobsen, J. J., Slot, A., Mens, J.-W. M., Stam, T. C., Van Triest, B., Van der Steen - Banasik, E. M., De Winter, K. A. J., Quinn, M. A., Kolodziej, I., Pyman, J., Johnson, C., Capp, A., Fossati, R., Gribaudo, S., Lissoni, A. A., Ferrero, A., Artioli, G., Davidson, C., McLachlin, C. M., Ghatage, P., Rittenberg, P. V. C., Souhami, L., Thomas, G., Duvillard, P., Berton-Rigaud, D., & Tubiana-Mathieu, N.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-309
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2787725515
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 66.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30079-2
- The paper
- de Boer, S. M., Powell, M. E., Mileshkin, L., Katsaros, D., Bessette, P., Haie-Meder, C., Ottevanger, P. B., Ledermann, J. A., Khaw, P., Colombo, A., Fyles, A., Baron, M.-H., Jürgenliemk-Schulz, I. M., Kitchener, H. C., Nijman, H. W., Wilson, G., Brooks, S., Carinelli, S., Provencher, D., . . . Tubiana-Mathieu, N. (2018). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30079-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.