The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. We updated the analysis to investigate patterns of recurrence and did a post-hoc survival analysis. METHODS: given intravenously), by use of a biased coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and failure-free survival. Secondary endpoints of vaginal, pelvic, and distant recurrence were analysed according to the first site of recurrence. Survival endpoints were analysed by intention-to-treat, and adjusted for stratification factors. Competing risk methods were used for failure-free survival and recurrence. We did a post-hoc analysis to analyse patterns of recurrence with 1 additional year of follow-up. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013; follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14387080, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138. FINDINGS: Between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013, 686 women were enrolled, of whom 660 were eligible and evaluable (330 in the chemoradiotherapy group, and 330 in the radiotherapy-alone group). At a median follow-up of 72·6 months (IQR 59·9-85·6), 5-year overall survival was 81·4% (95% CI 77·2-85·8) with chemoradiotherapy versus 76·1% (71·6-80·9) with radiotherapy alone (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·51-0·97], p=0·034), and 5-year failure-free survival was 76·5% (95% CI 71·5-80·7) versus 69·1% (63·8-73·8; HR 0·70 [0·52-0·94], p=0·016). Distant metastases were the first site of recurrence in most patients with a relapse, occurring in 78 of 330 women (5-year probability 21·4%; 95% CI 17·3-26·3) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 98 of 330 (5-year probability 29·1%; 24·4-34·3) in the radiotherapy-alone group (HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·55-0·99]; p=0·047). Isolated vaginal recurrence was the first site of recurrence in one patient (0·3%; 95% CI 0·0-2·1) in both groups (HR 0·99 [95% CI 0·06-15·90]; p=0·99), and isolated pelvic recurrence was the first site of recurrence in three women (0·9% [95% CI 0·3-2·8]) in the chemoradiotherapy group versus four (0·9% [95% CI 0·3-2·8]) in the radiotherapy-alone group (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·17-3·33]; p=0·71). At 5 years, only one grade 4 adverse event (ileus or obstruction) was reported (in the chemoradiotherapy group). At 5 years, reported grade 3 adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups, occurring in 16 (8%) of 201 women in the chemoradiotherapy group versus ten (5%) of 187 in the radiotherapy-alone group (p=0·24). The most common grade 3 adverse event was hypertension (in four [2%] women in both groups). At 5 years, grade 2 or worse adverse events were reported in 76 (38%) of 201 women in the chemoradiotherapy group versus 43 (23%) of 187 in the radiotherapy-alone group (p=0·002). Sensory neuropathy persisted more often after chemoradiotherapy than after radiotherapy alone, with 5-year rates of grade 2 or worse neuropathy of 6% (13 of 201 women) versus 0% (0 of 187). No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: This updated analysis shows significantly improved overall survival and failure-free survival with chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. This treatment schedule should be discussed and recommended, especially for women with stage III or serous cancers, or both, as part of shared decision making between doctors and patients. Follow-up is ongoing to evaluate long-term survival. FUNDING: Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council, Project Grant, Cancer Australia Grant, Italian Medicines Agency, and the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals
GRAMBSCH, P. M., & THERNEAU, T. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.515 · Cited by 5,885
The Analysis of Multiple Endpoints in Clinical Trials
Pocock, S. J., Geller, N. L., & Tsiatis, A. A. (1987) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531989 · Cited by 524
Cited by
ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma
Concin, N., Matias-Guiu, X., Vergote, I., Cibula, D., Mirza, M. R., Marnitz, S., Ledermann, J., Bosse, T., Chargari, C., Fagotti, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230 · Cited by 1,989
Self-citationLeón-Castillo, A., de Boer, S. M., Powell, M. E., Mileshkin, L. R., Mackay, H. J., Leary, A., Nijman, H. W., Singh, N., Pollock, P. M., Bessette, P., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.20.00549 · Cited by 855
Self-citationCancer of the corpus uteri: 2021 update
Koskas, M., Amant, F., Mirza, M. R., & Creutzberg, C. L. (2021) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.13866 · Cited by 298
Self-citationMoro, F., Albanese, M., Boldrini, L., Chiappa, V., Lenkowicz, J., Bertolina, F., Mascilini, F., Moroni, R., Gambacorta, M. A., Raspagliesi, F., et al. (2022) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.24805 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- de Boer, S. M., Powell, M. E., Mileshkin, L., Katsaros, D., Bessette, P., Haie-Meder, C., Ottevanger, P. B., Ledermann, J. A., Khaw, P., D'Amico, R., Fyles, A., Baron, M.-H., Jürgenliemk-Schulz, I. M., Kitchener, H. C., Nijman, H. W., Wilson, G., Brooks, S., Gribaudo, S., Provencher, D., Hanzen, C., Kruitwagen, R. F., Smit, V. T. H. B. M., Singh, N., Do, V., Lissoni, A., Nout, R. A., Feeney, A., Verhoeven-Adema, K. W., Putter, H., Creutzberg, C. L., McCormack, M., Whitmarsh, K., Allerton, R., Gregory, D., Symonds, P., Hoskin, P., Adusumalli, M., Anand, A., Wade, R., Stewart, A., Taylor, W., Lutgens, L., Hollema, H., Pras, E., Snyers, A., Westerveld, G., Jobsen, J., Slot, A., Mens, J., Stam, T., Van Triest, B., Van der Steen-Banasik, E., De Winter, K., Quinn, M., Kolodziej, I., Pyman, J., Johnson, C., Capp, A., Fossati, R., Colombo, A., Carinelli, S., Ferrero, A., Artioli, G., Davidson, C., McLachlin, C., Ghatage, P., Rittenberg, P., Souhami, L., Thomas, G., Duvillard, P., Berton-Rigaud, D., & Tubiana-Mathieu, N.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1273-1285
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2963015093
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 56.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30395-x
- The paper
- de Boer, S. M., Powell, M. E., Mileshkin, L., Katsaros, D., Bessette, P., Haie-Meder, C., Ottevanger, P. B., Ledermann, J. A., Khaw, P., D'Amico, R., Fyles, A., Baron, M.-H., Jürgenliemk-Schulz, I. M., Kitchener, H. C., Nijman, H. W., Wilson, G., Brooks, S., Gribaudo, S., Provencher, D., . . . Tubiana-Mathieu, N. (2019). Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30395-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.