The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy for patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma offers poor long-term survival prospects. We report the final analysis from our study of the immune checkpoint PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (ATTRACTION-3) at 90 hospitals and cancer centres in Denmark, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA. We enrolled patients aged 20 years and older with unresectable advanced or recurrent oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (regardless of PD-L1 expression), at least one measurable or non-measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and who were refractory or intolerant to one previous fluoropyrimidine-based and platinum-based chemotherapy and had a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either nivolumab (240 mg for 30 min every 2 weeks) or investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 for at least 60 min once per week for 6 weeks then 1 week off; or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 for at least 60 min every 3 weeks), all given intravenously. Treatment continued until disease progression assessed by the investigator per RECIST version 1.1 or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was done using an interactive web response system with a block size of four and stratified according to geographical region (Japan vs rest of the world), number of organs with metastases, and PD-L1 expression. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation until death from any cause, in the intention-to-treat population that included all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02569242, and follow-up for long-term outcomes is ongoing. FINDINGS Between Jan 7, 2016, and May 25, 2017, we assigned 419 patients to treatment: 210 to nivolumab and 209 to chemotherapy. At the time of data cutoff on Nov 12, 2018, median follow-up for overall survival was 10·5 months (IQR 4·5-19·0) in the nivolumab group and 8·0 months (4·6-15·2) in the chemotherapy group. At a minimum follow-up time (ie, time from random assignment of the last patient to data cutoff) of 17·6 months, overall survival was significantly improved in the nivolumab group compared with the chemotherapy group (median 10·9 months, 95% CI 9·2-13·3 vs 8·4 months, 7·2-9·9; hazard ratio for death 0·77, 95% CI 0·62-0·96; p=0·019). 38 (18%) of 209 patients in the nivolumab group had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events compared with 131 (63%) of 208 patients in the chemotherapy group. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were anaemia (four [2%]) in the nivolumab group and decreased neutrophil count (59 [28%]) in the chemotherapy group. Five deaths were deemed treatment-related: two in the nivolumab group (one each of interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis) and three in the chemotherapy group (one each of pneumonia, spinal cord abscess, and interstitial lung disease). INTERPRETATION Nivolumab was associated with a significant improvement in overall survivaland a favourable safety profile compared with chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and might represent a new standard second-line treatment option for these patients. FUNDING ONO Pharmaceutical and Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109
Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer
Borghaei, H., Paz-Ares, L., Horn, L., Spigel, D. R., Steins, M., Ready, N. E., Chow, L. Q., Vokes, E. E., Felip, E., Holgado, E., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1507643 · Cited by 9,335
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Brahmer, J., Reckamp, K. L., Baas, P., Crinò, L., Eberhardt, W. E. E., Poddubskaya, E., Antonia, S., Pluzanski, A., Vokes, E. E., Holgado, E., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504627 · Cited by 8,447
Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Motzer, R. J., Escudier, B., McDermott, D. F., George, S., Hammers, H. J., Srinivas, S., Tykodi, S. S., Sosman, J. A., Procopio, G., Plimack, E. R., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1510665 · Cited by 5,807
Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Ferris, R. L., Blumenschein, G., Fayette, J., Guigay, J., Colevas, A. D., Licitra, L., Harrington, K., Kasper, S., Vokes, E. E., Even, C., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1602252 · Cited by 5,101
Cited by
Sun, J.-M., Shen, L., Shah, M. A., Enzinger, P., Adenis, A., Doi, T., Kojima, T., Metges, J.-P., Li, Z., Kim, S.-B., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01234-4 · Cited by 1,635
Self-citationRen, Z., Xu, J., Bai, Y., Xu, A., Cang, S., Du, C., Li, Q., Lu, Y., Chen, Y., Guo, Y., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00252-7 · Cited by 1,124
Yau, T., Park, J.-W., Finn, R. S., Cheng, A.-L., Mathurin, P., Edeline, J., Kudo, M., Harding, J. J., Merle, P., Rosmorduc, O., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00604-5 · Cited by 1,106
Luo, H., Lu, J., Bai, Y., Mao, T., Wang, J., Fan, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhao, K., Chen, Z., Gao, S., et al. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.12836 · Cited by 803
Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Obermannová, R., Alsina, M., Cervantes, A., Leong, T., Lordick, F., Nilsson, M., van Grieken, N. C. T., Vogel, A., & Smyth, E. C. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.003 · Cited by 730
Metadata
- Authors
- Kato, K., Cho, B. C., Takahashi, M., Okada, M., Lin, C.-Y., Chin, K., Kadowaki, S., Ahn, M.-J., Hamamoto, Y., Doki, Y., Yen, C.-C., Kubota, Y., Kim, S.-B., Hsu, C.-H., Holtved, E., Xynos, I., Kodani, M., & Kitagawa, Y.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1506-1517
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2976652879
- Cited by
- 1,213
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 119.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30626-6
- The paper
- Kato, K., Cho, B. C., Takahashi, M., Okada, M., Lin, C.-Y., Chin, K., Kadowaki, S., Ahn, M.-J., Hamamoto, Y., Doki, Y., Yen, C.-C., Kubota, Y., Kim, S.-B., Hsu, C.-H., Holtved, E., Xynos, I., Kodani, M., & Kitagawa, Y. (2019). Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30626-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.