The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bevacizumab and platinum-based combinations for recurrent ovarian cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND State-of-the art therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer suitable for platinum-based re-treatment includes bevacizumab-containing combinations (eg, bevacizumab combined with carboplatin-paclitaxel or carboplatin-gemcitabine) or the most active non-bevacizumab regimen: carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. The aim of this head-to-head trial was to compare a standard bevacizumab-containing regimen versus carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combined with bevacizumab. METHODS This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, was done in 159 academic centres in Germany, France, Australia, Austria, and the UK. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) had histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma with first disease recurrence more than 6 months after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients were stratified by platinum-free interval, residual tumour, previous antiangiogenic therapy, and study group language, and were centrally randomly assigned 1:1 using randomly permuted blocks of size two, four, or six to receive six intravenous cycles of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, day 1) plus carboplatin (area under the concentration curve [AUC] 4, day 1) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks or six cycles of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, days 1 and 15) plus carboplatin (AUC 5, day 1) plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (30 mg/m2, day 1) every 4 weeks, both followed by maintenance bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks in both groups) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. There was no masking in this open-label trial. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Efficacy data were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01837251. FINDINGS Between Aug 1, 2013, and July 31, 2015, 682 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 345 were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-bevacizumab (experimental group) and 337 were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin-gemcitabine-bevacizumab (standard group). Median follow-up for progression-free survival at data cutoff (July 10, 2018) was 12·4 months (IQR 8·3-21·7) in the experimental group and 11·3 months (8·0-18·4) in the standard group. Median progression-free survival was 13·3 months (95% CI 11·7-14·2) in the experimental group versus 11·6 months (11·0-12·7) in the standard group (hazard ratio 0·81, 95% CI 0·68-0·96; p=0·012). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (88 [27%] of 332 patients in the experimental group vs 67 [20%] of 329 patients in the standard group) and neutropenia (40 [12%] vs 73 [22%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 33 (10%) of 332 patients in the experimental group and 28 (9%) of 329 in the standard group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the experimental group (<1%; large intestine perforation) and two patients in the standard group (1%; one case each of osmotic demyelination syndrome and intracranial haemorrhage). INTERPRETATION Carboplatin-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-bevacizumab is a new standard treatment option for platinum-eligible recurrent ovarian cancer. FUNDING F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Updates and New Options in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treatment
Kurnit, K. C., Fleming, G. F., & Lengyel, E. (2021) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000004173 · Cited by 322
Caruso, G., Weroha, S. J., & Cliby, W. (2025) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.9495 · Cited by 304
Hack, S. P., Zhu, A. X., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.598877 · Cited by 286
Angiogenesis as a hallmark of solid tumors - clinical perspectives
Majidpoor, J., & Mortezaee, K. (2021) · Cellular Oncology · doi:10.1007/s13402-021-00602-3 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfisterer, J., Shannon, C. M., Baumann, K., Rau, J., Harter, P., Joly, F., Sehouli, J., Canzler, U., Schmalfeldt, B., Dean, A. P., Hein, A., Zeimet, A. G., Hanker, L. C., Petit, T., Marmé, F., El-Balat, A., Glasspool, R., de Gregorio, N., Mahner, S., Meniawy, T. M., Park-Simon, T.-W., Mouret-Reynier, M.-A., Costan, C., Meier, W., Reinthaller, A., Goh, J. C., L'Haridon, T., Baron Hay, S., Kommoss, S., du Bois, A., Kurtz, J.-E., Ackermann, S., Anthuber, C., Aydogdu, M., Baldauf, A., Bauer, W., Behringer, D., Belau, A., Bender, A., Brucker, C., Burges, A., Canzler, U., Daabach, T., Denschlag, D., Deryal, M., Dörfel, S., Ebert, J., El-Balat, A., Fehm, T., Feidicker, S. M., Feisel-Schwickardi, G., Felberbaum, R., Frank, M., Gebauer, G., Gerber, B., Gerhardt, A., Grafe, A., Griesshammer, M., Grischke, E.-M., Gröll, I., Gropp-Meier, M., Hager, D., Hanf, V., Hannig, C. V., Hantschmann, P., Harter, P., Hauzenberger, T., Herwig, U., Heubner, M., Hielscher, C., Hilpert, F., Hitschold, T., Hofmann, M., Jackisch, C., Janni, W., Kiesel, L., Ko, Y.-D., Koch, H.-J., Krabisch, P., Krieger, P., Kubin, T., Kühn, T., Lampe, B., Ledwon, P., Lemster, S., Lex, B., Liebrich, C., Lorenz, R., Lück, H.-J., Mahner, S., Mallmann, P., Marmé, F., Meier, W., Meinerz, W., Menke, G., Möbus, V., Müller, T., Müller, V., Neunhöffer, T., Ober, A., Oskay-Özcelik, G., Ostertag, H., Park-Simon, T.-W., Pölcher, M., Rautenberg, B., Rein, D., Reiter, W., Rempen, A., Runnebaum, I., Schmalfeldt, B., Schmidt, M., Schnohr, S., Scholz, H., Schröder, W., Sehouli, J., Simon, E., Sperfeld, A., Steckkönig, A., Strauß, H.-G., Stuth, R., Terhaag, J., Thiel, F., Thill, M., Tomé, O., Uleer, C., Vogel, S., Voß, H., Weigel, M., Winkler, U., Wischnik, A., Zeiser, T., Zorr, A., Glasspool, R., Hudson, E., Jones, R., Lafleur, J., Marth, C., Petru, E., Reinthaller, A., Antill, Y., Azer, M., Baron-Hay, S., Beale, P., Begbie, S., Black, A., Briscoe, K., Dean, A., Goh, J., Harvey, S., Lee, C., Matos, M., Meniawy, T., Olesen, I., Shannon, C., Vasey, P., Abadie-Lacourtoisie, S., Arsene, O., Barthier, S., Becuwe-Roemer, C., Berton-Rigaud, D., Cappiello-Bataller, M., Catala, S., Costan, C., Del Piano, F., Deplanque, G., Despax, R., Dohollou, N., Garnier-Tixidré, C., Grenier, J., Guardiola, E., Hardy-Bessard, A.-C., Joly, F., Kurtz, J.-E., Lefeuvre-Plesse, C., Leheurteur, M., Lesoin, A., Levache, C.-B., L'Haridon, T., Longo, R., Lortholary, A., Meunier, J., Mouret-Reynier, M.-A., Petit, T., Raban, N., Romano, O., Vannetzel, J.-M., & Zannetti, A.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 699-709
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3016364201
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bevacizumab and platinum-based combinations for recurrent ovarian cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30142-x
- The paper
- Pfisterer, J., Shannon, C. M., Baumann, K., Rau, J., Harter, P., Joly, F., Sehouli, J., Canzler, U., Schmalfeldt, B., Dean, A. P., Hein, A., Zeimet, A. G., Hanker, L. C., Petit, T., Marmé, F., El-Balat, A., Glasspool, R., de Gregorio, N., Mahner, S., . . . Zannetti, A. (2020). Bevacizumab and platinum-based combinations for recurrent ovarian cancer: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30142-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.