Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice consensus recommendations on patient selection and dose and fractionation for external beam radiotherapy in early breast cancer

Open access
Meattini, Icro, Becherini, Carlotta, Boersma, Liesbeth, Kaidar-Person, Orit, Marta, Gustavo Nader, Montero, Angel, Offersen, Birgitte Vrou, Aznar, Marianne C, Belka, Claus, Brunt, Adrian Murray, Dicuonzo, Samantha, Franco, Pierfrancesco, Krause, Mechthild, MacKenzie, Mairead, Marinko, Tanja, Marrazzo, Livia, Ratosa, Ivica, Scholten, Astrid, Senkus, Elżbieta, Stobart, Hilary, Poortmans, Philip, Coles, Charlotte E·2022·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

High-quality randomised clinical trials testing moderately fractionated breast radiotherapy have clearly shown that local control and survival is at least as effective as with 2 Gy daily fractions with similar or reduced normal tissue toxicity. Fewer treatment visits are welcomed by patients and their families, and reduced fractions produce substantial savings for health-care systems. Implementation of hypofractionation, however, has moved at a slow pace. The oncology community have now reached an inflection point created by new evidence from the FAST-Forward five-fraction randomised trial and catalysed by the need for the global radiation oncology community to unite during the COVID-19 pandemic and rapidly rethink hypofractionation implementation. The aim of this paper is to support equity of access for all patients to receive evidence-based breast external beam radiotherapy and to facilitate the translation of new evidence into routine daily practice. The results from this European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice consensus state that moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy can be offered to any patient for whole breast, chest wall (with or without reconstruction), and nodal volumes. Ultrafractionation (five fractions) can also be offered for non-nodal breast or chest wall (without reconstruction) radiotherapy either as standard of care or within a randomised trial or prospective cohort. The consensus is timely; not only is it a pragmatic framework for radiation oncologists, but it provides a measured proposal for the path forward to influence policy makers and empower patients to ensure equity of access to evidence-based radiotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00539-8

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Meattini, I., Becherini, C., Boersma, L., Kaidar-Person, O., Marta, G. N., Montero, A., Offersen, B. V., Aznar, M. C., Belka, C., Brunt, A. M., Dicuonzo, S., Franco, P., Krause, M., MacKenzie, M., Marinko, T., Marrazzo, L., Ratosa, I., Scholten, A., Senkus, E., Stobart, H., Poortmans, P., & Coles, C. E.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
e21-e31
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205292601
Cited by
267
References
43
FWCI
14.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice consensus recommendations on patient selection and dose and fractionation for external beam radiotherapy in early breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00539-8
The paper
Meattini, I., Becherini, C., Boersma, L., Kaidar-Person, O., Marta, G. N., Montero, A., Offersen, B. V., Aznar, M. C., Belka, C., Brunt, A. M., Dicuonzo, S., Franco, P., Krause, M., MacKenzie, M., Marinko, T., Marrazzo, L., Ratosa, I., Scholten, A., Senkus, E., . . . Coles, C. E. (2022). European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice consensus recommendations on patient selection and dose and fractionation for external beam radiotherapy in early breast cancer. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00539-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.