The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): 2-year toxicity results from an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Localised prostate cancer is commonly treated with external beam radiotherapy and moderate hypofractionation is non-inferior to longer schedules. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) allows shorter treatment courses without impacting acute toxicity. We report 2-year toxicity findings from PACE-B, a randomised trial of conventionally fractionated or moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy versus SBRT. METHODS: PACE is an open-label, multicohort, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial conducted at 35 hospitals in the UK, Ireland, and Canada. In PACE-B, men aged 18 years and older with a WHO performance status 0-2 and low-risk or intermediate-risk histologically-confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason 4 + 3 excluded) were randomly allocated (1:1) by computerised central randomisation with permuted blocks (size four and six), stratified by centre and risk group to control radiotherapy (CRT; 78 Gy in 39 fractions over 7·8 weeks or, following protocol amendment on March 24, 2016, 62 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks) or SBRT (36·25 Gy in five fractions over 1-2 weeks). Androgen deprivation was not permitted. Co-primary outcomes for this toxicity analysis were Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity at 24 months after radiotherapy. Analysis was by treatment received and included all patients with at least one fraction of study treatment assessed for late toxicity. Recruitment is complete. Follow-up for oncological outcomes continues. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01584258. FINDINGS: We enrolled and randomly assigned 874 men between Aug 7, 2012, and Jan 4, 2018 (441 to CRT and 433 to SBRT). In this analysis, 430 patients were analysed in the CRT group and 414 in the SBRT group; a total of 844 (97%) of 874 randomly assigned patients. At 24 months, RTOG grade 2 or worse genitourinary toxicity was seen in eight (2%) of 381 participants assigned to CRT and 13 (3%) of 384 participants assigned to SBRT (absolute difference 1·3% [95% CI -1·3 to 4·0]; p=0·39); RTOG grade 2 or worse gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 11 (3%) of 382 participants in the CRT group versus six (2%) of 384 participants in the SBRT group (absolute difference -1·3% [95% CI -3·9 to 1·1]; p=0·32). No serious adverse events (defined as RTOG grade 4 or worse) or treatment-related deaths were reported within the analysis timeframe. INTERPRETATION: In the PACE-B trial, 2-year RTOG toxicity rates were similar for five fraction SBRT and conventional schedules of radiotherapy. Prostate SBRT was found to be safe and associated with low rates of side-effects. Biochemical outcomes are awaited. FUNDING: Accuray.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21660 · Cited by 108,699
Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I. H., Kirkpatrick, J., & Mishra, A. (1997) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0 · Cited by 5,849
The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Barry, M. J., Fowler, F. J., O’Leary, M. P., Bruskewitz, R. C., Holtgrewe, H. L., Mebust, W. K., Cockett, A. T. K., & The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association (1992) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36966-5 · Cited by 3,436
Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems
Vaizey, C. J., Carapeti, E., Cahill, J. A., & Kamm, M. A. (1999) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.44.1.77 · Cited by 1,372
Dearnaley, D., Syndikus, I., Mossop, H., Khoo, V., Birtle, A., Bloomfield, D., Graham, J., Kirkbride, P., Logue, J., Malik, Z., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30102-4 · Cited by 1,339
Self-citationWidmark, A., Gunnlaugsson, A., Beckman, L., Thellenberg-Karlsson, C., Hoyer, M., Lagerlund, M., Kindblom, J., Ginman, C., Johansson, B., Björnlinger, K., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31131-6 · Cited by 876
Catton, C. N., Lukka, H., Gu, C.-S., Martin, J. M., Supiot, S., Chung, P. W. M., Bauman, G. S., Bahary, J.-P., Ahmed, S., Cheung, P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.71.7397 · Cited by 713
Self-citationLee, W. R., Dignam, J. J., Amin, M. B., Bruner, D. W., Low, D., Swanson, G. P., Shah, A. B., D’Souza, D. P., Michalski, J. M., Dayes, I. S., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.67.0448 · Cited by 625
Self-citationBrand, D. H., Tree, A. C., Ostler, P. J., van der Voet, H., Loblaw, A., Chu, W., Ford, D., Tolan, S. P., Jain, S., Martin, A. S., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30569-8 · Cited by 572
Self-citationKerkmeijer, L. G. W., Groen, V. H., Pos, F. J., Haustermans, K., Monninkhof, E. M., Smeenk, R. J., Kunze-Busch, M., de Boer, J. C. J., van der Voort van Zijp, J., van Vulpen, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.20.02873 · Cited by 531
Cited by
Cornford, P., van den Bergh, R. C. N., Briers, E., Van den Broeck, T., Brunckhorst, O., Darraugh, J., Eberli, D., De Meerleer, G., De Santis, M., Farolfi, A., et al. (2024) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027 · Cited by 1,246
Metadata
- Authors
- Tree, A. C., Ostler, P., van der Voet, H., Chu, W., Loblaw, A., Ford, D., Tolan, S., Jain, S., Martin, A., Staffurth, J., Armstrong, J., Camilleri, P., Kancherla, K., Frew, J., Chan, A., Dayes, I. S., Duffton, A., Brand, D. H., Henderson, D., Morrison, K., Brown, S., Pugh, J., Burnett, S., Mahmud, M., Hinder, V., Naismith, O., Hall, E., van As, N., Lartigau, E., Patton, S., Thompson, A., Winkler, M., Wells, P., Lymberiou, T., Saunders, D., Vilarino-Varela, M., Vavassis, P., Tsakiridis, T., Carlson, R., Rodrigues, G., Tanguay, J., Iqbal, S., Winkler, M., Morgan, S., Mihai, A., Li, A., Din, O., Panades, M., Wade, R., Rimmer, Y., Panades, M., & Oommen, N.
- Venue
- The Lancet Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1308-1320
- ISSN
- 1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4295838570
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 37.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): 2-year toxicity results from an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00517-4
- The paper
- Tree, A. C., Ostler, P., van der Voet, H., Chu, W., Loblaw, A., Ford, D., Tolan, S., Jain, S., Martin, A., Staffurth, J., Armstrong, J., Camilleri, P., Kancherla, K., Frew, J., Chan, A., Dayes, I. S., Duffton, A., Brand, D. H., Henderson, D., . . . Oommen, N. (2022). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): 2-year toxicity results from an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00517-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.