Cited by 12Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The genomic and clinical consequences of replacing procarbazine with dacarbazine in escalated BEACOPP for Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective, observational study

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Procarbazine-containing chemotherapy regimens are associated with cytopenias and infertility, suggesting stem-cell toxicity. When treating Hodgkin lymphoma, procarbazine in escalated-dose bleomycin-etoposide-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-vincristine-procarbazine-prednisolone (eBEACOPP) is increasingly replaced with dacarbazine (eBEACOPDac) to reduce toxicity. We aimed to investigate the impact of this drug substitution on the mutation burden in stem cells, patient survival, and toxicity. METHODS: In this two-part retrospective, observational study, we first compared mutational landscapes in haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in remission for at least 6 months who had been treated with eBEACOPDac (eBEACOPDac cohort), eBEACOPP (real-world eBEACOPP cohort), or doxorubicin-bleomycin-vinblastine-dacarbazine (ABVD); in buccal DNA from five children of a female patient with classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated with eBEACOPP before conceiving the third child; in sperm DNA from a patient with mild oligospermia treated with eBEACOPP; and in caecal adenocarcinoma and healthy colon tissue from a survivor of Hodgkin lymphoma treated with chlorambucil-vinblastine-procarbazine-prednisolone. For the second part, we analysed efficacy and toxicity data from adult patients (aged >16 years) treated with first-line eBEACOPDac (eBEACOPDac cohort) at 25 centres across UK, Ireland, and France; efficacy was compared with the German HD18 eBEACOPP trial data and toxicity with a UK real-world dataset. Participants in the German HD18 and UK real-world datasets were adults (aged >16 years) with previously untreated Hodgkin lymphoma, treated with first-line eBEACOPP. We had two co-primary objectives: to define the comparative stem-cell mutation burden and mutational signatures after treatment with or without procarbazine-containing chemotherapy (first study part); and to determine progression-free survival of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated with eBEACOPP or eBEACOPDac (second study part). Secondary objectives included overall survival and explored differences in specific toxicity outcomes, including transfusion requirements and measures of reproductive health (second study part). FINDINGS: In the first part of the study (mutational analysis), patients treated with eBEACOPP (n=5) exhibited a higher burden of point mutations in HSPCs compared with those treated with eBEACOPDac (n=4) or ABVD (n=3; excess mutations 1150 [95% CI 934-1366] vs 290 [241-339] vs 186 [116-254]). Two novel mutational signatures, SBSA (SBS25-like) and SBSB, were identified in HSPCs and in a single neoplastic and healthy colon sample from patients who received procarbazine-containing chemotherapy. SBSB was also identified in germline DNA of three children conceived after eBEACOPP and in sperm of a male patient treated with eBEACOPP. SBSC was detected in patients treated with either ABVD or eBEACOPDac. In the second part of the study (efficacy and toxicity analysis), dacarbazine substitution did not appear to compromise efficacy or safety. 312 patients treated with eBEACOPDac (eBEACOPDac cohort; treated 2017-22, 186 [60%] male, median follow-up 36·0 months [IQR 25·2-50·1]) had a 3-year progression-free survival of 93·3% (95% CI 90·3-96·4), which was similar to the 93·3% [95% CI 92·1-94·4]) progression-free survival seen in 1945 patients in the German HD18 eBEACOPP trial (treated 2008-14, 1183 [61%] male, median follow-up 57·0 months [35·4-64·7]). Patients treated with eBEACOPDac required fewer blood transfusions (mean 1·70 units [SD 2·77] vs 3·69 units [3·89]; p<0·0001), demonstrated higher post-chemotherapy sperm concentrations (median 23·4 million per mL [IQR 11·0-632·3] vs 0·0 million per mL [0·0-0·001]; p=0·0040), and had earlier resumption of menstrual periods (mean 5·04 months [SD 3·07] vs 8·77 months [5·57]; p=0·0036) compared with 73 patients treated with eBEACOPP in the UK real-world dataset. INTERPRETATION: Procarbazine induces a higher mutation burden and novel mutational signatures in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated with eBEACOPP and their germline DNA, raising concerns for the genomic health of survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma and hereditary consequences for their offspring. However, replacing procarbazine with dacarbazine appears to mitigate gonadal and stem-cell toxicity while maintaining similar clinical efficacy. FUNDING: Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust and Wellcome Trust.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00598-9

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 34 references

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Santarsieri, A., Mitchell, E., Pham, M. H., Sanghvi, R., Jablonski, J., Lee-Six, H., Sturgess, K., Brice, P., Menne, T. F., Osborne, W., Creasey, T., Ardeshna, K. M., Baxter, J., Behan, S., Bhuller, K., Booth, S., Chavda, N. D., Collins, G. P., Culligan, D. J., Cwynarski, K., Davies, A., Downing, A., Dutton, D., Furtado, M., Gallop-Evans, E., Hodson, A., Hopkins, D., Hsu, H., Iyengar, S., Jones, S. G., Karanth, M., Linton, K. M., Lomas, O. C., Martinez-Calle, N., Mathur, A., McKay, P., Nagumantry, S. K., Phillips, E. H., Phillips, N., Rudge, J. F., Shah, N. K., Stafford, G., Sternberg, A., Trickey, R., Uttenthal, B. J., Wetherall, N., Zhang, X.-Y., McMillan, A. K., Coleman, N., Stratton, M. R., Laurenti, E., Borchmann, P., Borchmann, S., Campbell, P. J., Rahbari, R., & Follows, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB)
  • Royal Berkshire Hospital (GB)
  • University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Churchill Hospital (GB)
  • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Velindre Cancer Centre (GB)
  • Great Western Hospital (GB)
  • Royal Cornwall Hospital (GB)
  • Ipswich Hospital (GB)
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (GB)
  • Royal Marsden Hospital (GB)
  • Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Peterborough City Hospital (GB)
  • Royal Stoke University Hospital (GB)
  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Rahbari, Raheleh
  • Follows, George A
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
98-109
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405267337
Cited by
12
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Wellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital
  • Cancer Research UK (C66259/A27114)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Keywords
Hodgkin's disease, procarbazine, dacarbazine, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, mutational signatures, stem cell toxicity, infertility, cytopenia, progression-free survival, overall survival, chemotherapy toxicity, buccal DNA, sperm DNA, caecal adenocarcinoma, first-line chemotherapy
MeSH terms
Progression-Free Survival, Adolescent, Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Bleomycin, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Etoposide, Female, Hodgkin Disease, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Prednisone, Procarbazine, Retrospective Studies, Vincristine, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review