Circulating cell-free DNA as a potential biomarker for minimal and mild endometriosis
Open accessAbstract
It has recently been reported that high concentrations of circulating cell-free (ccf) nucleic acids in plasma and serum could be used as biomarkers for non-invasive monitoring a wide variety of malignant and benign proliferations and inflammatory conditions. Endometriosis is one of the most common benign gynaecological proliferations with inflammatory activation in premenopausal women. Real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction was used for synchronized quantification of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequence in nuclear DNA (nDNA) and the ATP synthase-8 gene sequence in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). DNA was extracted from 500 microl serum and plasma of 19 cases with endometriosis to measure the total amount of ccf nDNA and ccf mtDNA. The concentration of ccf nDNA in plasma was significantly higher in the endometriosis group than in the control group (P = 0.046). The cut-off value selected by a receiver operating characteristic curve could provide a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 87% to discriminate between the minimal or mild cases and normal controls. The finding of significantly increased concentrations of ccf nDNA in plasma of patients with endometriosis suggests that ccf nDNA might be a potential biomarker for developing non-invasive diagnostic test in endometriosis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The concentration of circulating cell-free nuclear DNA was higher in endometriosis patients compared with the control group (P=0.046).
“In a study by Zachariah et al., the concentration of circulating cell-free nuclear DNA was higher in endometriosis patients compared with the control group (P = 0.046), leading to the conclusion that circulating cell-free DNA may be a potential biomarker for endometriosis [95].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [95]
Circulating cell-free DNA may be a potential biomarker for endometriosis.
“leading to the conclusion that circulating cell-free DNA may be a potential biomarker for endometriosis [95].”
From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [95]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Zachariah, R., Schmid, S., Radpour, R., Buerki, N., Fan, A. X.-C., Hahn, S., Holzgreve, W., & Zhong, X. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
- Venue
- Reproductive BioMedicine Online
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-411
- ISSN
- 1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071999223
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Krebsliga Beider Basel
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- endometriosis, cell-free DNA, cell-free mitochondrial DNA, non-invasive diagnosis, biomarkers, serum biomarkers, plasma DNA, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, DNA, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Primers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review