Obesity and assisted reproductive technology outcomes
Abstract
Obesity is a rising health problem in Western societies. It has been related to increased morbidity and mortality rates due to several pathologies. In the field of gynaecology and reproduction, obesity is associated with menstrual disorders, hirsutism, infertility, miscarriage and obstetric complications. It is known to impair human reproduction through different mechanisms such as insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism and elevated leptin levels. Weight management and dietary intervention can reverse this situation and improve reproductive function. Obesity can also impair the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. The lower probability of a healthy live birth described in obese women seems to be the result of a combination of lower implantation and pregnancy rates, higher preclinical and clinical miscarriage rates and increased complications during pregnancy for both mother and fetus. Studies performed in infertile women undergoing assisted reproduction technologies indicate that the ovary plays a leading, but not exclusive, role in the fertility prognosis of these patients. The endocrine and metabolic environment may affect oocyte quality and, therefore, embryo development, implantation and pregnancy outcome. The endometrium seems to play a subtle role in the more negative reproductive outcome of obese women, according to recent studies based on the ovum donation model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is well-established that obesity is related to menstrual disorders, infertility, miscarriage, obstetric complications, live birth rate and can affect the success of assisted reproductive technology.
“It is well-established that obesity is related to menstrual disorders, infertility, miscarriage, obstetric complications, live birth rate and can affect the success of assisted reproductive technology.29–32”
From Real-world menstrual cycle characteristics of more than 600,000 menstrual cycles (2019) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 100
- Authors
- Bellver, J., Busso, C., Pellicer, A., Remohí, J., & Simón, C.
- Affiliations
- Universitat de València (ES)
- Venue
- Reproductive BioMedicine Online
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 562-568
- ISSN
- 1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162788096
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Keywords
- obesity, assisted reproduction outcomes, infertility, miscarriage, live birth rate, implantation rate, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism, leptin, oocyte quality, embryonic development, endometrium, oocyte donation, weight management, dietary intervention
- MeSH terms
- Endometrium, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Female, Obesity, Oocytes, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Ovary, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Treatment Outcome, Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review