Cited by 310Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal Infections and Studies

Antifungal drug resistance to azoles and polyenes

Canuto, Mar Masiá, Rodero, Félix Gutiérrez·2002·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

There is an increased awareness of the morbidity and mortality associated with fungal infections caused by resistant fungi in various groups of patients. Epidemiological studies have identified risk factors associated with antifungal drug resistance. Selection pressure due to the continuous exposure to azoles seems to have an essential role in developing resistance to fluconazole in Candida species. Haematological malignancies, especially acute leukaemia with severe and prolonged neutropenia, seem to be the main risk factors for acquiring deep-seated mycosis caused by resistant filamentous fungi, such us Fusarium species, Scedosporium prolificans, and Aspergillus terreus. The still unacceptably high mortality rate associated with some resistant mycosis indicates that alternatives to existing therapeutic options are needed. Potential measures to overcome antifungal resistance ranges from the development of new drugs with better antifungal activity to improving current therapeutic strategies with the present antifungal agents. Among the new antifungal drugs, inhibitors of beta glucan synthesis and second-generation azole and triazole derivatives have characteristics that render them potentially suitable agents against some resistant fungi. Other strategies including the use of high doses of lipid formulations of amphotericin B, combination therapy, and adjunctive immune therapy with cytokines are under investigation. In addition, antifungal control programmes to prevent extensive and inappropriate use of antifungals may be needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00371-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although Candida glabrata is frequently considered susceptible to amphotericin B, it has a clear tendency to have higher MIC values to polyenes than Candida albicans.

    “Although C. glabrata is frequently considered to be susceptible to amphotericin B, it has a clear tendency to have higher minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values to polyenes than C. albicans [76,114].”

    From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [76]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 170 · Cited by 310

Authors
Canuto, M. M., & Rodero, F. G.
Affiliations
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
Corresponding author
Rodero, Félix Gutiérrez
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
550-563
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014188602
Cited by
310
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
antifungal resistance, azoles, polyenes, fluconazole resistance, Candida, Fusarium, Scedosporium prolificans, Aspergillus terreus, hematologic malignancies, neutropenia, risk factors, triazole derivatives, lipid amphotericin B, combination antifungal therapy
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Azoles, Candida, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Humans, Mycoses, Polyenes, Risk Factors, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review