Cited by 188Malaria Research and ControlGlobal Maternal and Child HealthTravel-related health issues

Reducing the burden of malaria in pregnancy by preventive strategies

Menéndez, Clara, D'Alessandro, Umberto, ter Kuile, Feiko O·2007·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Malaria is one of the most common and preventable causes of adverse birth outcomes. In Africa, important progress has been made in the past decade with the introduction of a preventive strategy for malaria in pregnancy consisting of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) and insecticide-treated nets, yet their coverage is still unacceptably low and malaria continues to demand a huge toll on pregnant women and their newborn babies. Increasing the frequency of dosing of IPTp with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine might provide temporary respite, but increasing resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine makes research into safe, efficacious, and affordable alternatives for IPTp one of the highest priorities for the control of malaria in pregnancy. A number of promising alternatives are, or will soon be, available that need to be evaluated as IPTp after their safety and pharmacokinetics in pregnancy have first been assessed in parasitaemic women. Little is known about appropriate control strategies in Asia and Latin America for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria in pregnancy, which in most countries rely on responsive case management approaches. The role of case management based on proactive screening for malaria infection of women attending antenatal care or preventive approaches with insecticide-treated nets or IPTp are urgently needed. To achieve these objectives, multicentre and multidisciplinary approaches are required across the range of malaria transmission settings that include assessment of immunological effect of successful preventions, the perceptions and acceptability of different preventive approaches, and their cost-effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70024-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 97 · Cited by 188

Authors
Menéndez, C., D'Alessandro, U., & ter Kuile, F. O.
Affiliations
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Menéndez, Clara
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
126-135
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106333752
Cited by
188
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
Keywords
malaria in pregnancy, intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance, insecticide-treated nets, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, prenatal screening, case management, adverse birth outcomes, cost-effectiveness, preventive strategies
MeSH terms
Animals, Antimalarials, Bedding and Linens, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Insecticides, Mosquito Control, Plasmodium falciparum, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Malaria, Falciparum, Chemoprevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review