Effect of selective decontamination on antimicrobial resistance in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background Many meta-analyses have shown reductions in infection rates and mortality associated with the use of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) or selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) in intensive care units (ICUs). These interventions have not been widely implemented because of concerns that their use could lead to the development of antimicrobial resistance in pathogens. We aimed to assess the effect of SDD and SOD on antimicrobial resistance rates in patients in ICUs.Methods We did a systematic review of the effect of SDD and SOD on the rates of colonisation or infection with antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in patients who were critically ill. We searched for studies using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases, with no limits by language, date of publication, study design, or study quality. We included all studies of selective decontamination that involved prophylactic application of topical non-absorbable antimicrobials to the stomach or oropharynx of patients in ICUs, with or without additional systemic antimicrobials. We excluded studies of interventions that used only antiseptic or biocide agents such as chlorhexidine, unless antimicrobials were also included in the regimen. We used the Mantel-Haenszel model with random effects to calculate pooled odds ratios.Findings We analysed 64 unique studies of SDD and SOD in ICUs, of which 47 were randomised controlled trials and 35 included data for the detection of antimicrobial resistance. When comparing data for patients in intervention groups (those who received SDD or SOD) versus data for those in control groups (who received no intervention), we identified no difference in the prevalence of colonisation or infection with Gram-positive antimicrobial-resistant pathogens of interest, including meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (odds ratio 1·46, 95% CI 0·90-2·37) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (0·63, 0·39-1·02). Among Gram-negative bacilli, we detected no difference in aminoglycoside-resistance (0·73, 0·51-1·05) or fluoroquinolone-resistance (0·52, 0·16-1·68), but we did detect a reduction in polymyxin-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (0·58, 0·46-0·72) and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (0·33, 0·20-0·52) in recipients of selective decontamination compared with those who received no intervention.Interpretation We detected no relation between the use of SDD or SOD and the development of antimicrobial-resistance in pathogens in patients in the ICU, suggesting that the perceived risk of long-term harm related to selective decontamination cannot be justified by available data. However, our study indicates that the effect of decontamination on ICU-level antimicrobial resistance rates is understudied. We recommend that future research includes a non-crossover, cluster randomised controlled trial to assess long-term ICU-level changes in resistance rates.Funding None.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract remains uncommon, especially in North America, due to perceived risk of antimicrobial resistance, although this concern is not supported by large clinical trials and meta-analyses.
“clinical use of SDD remains uncommon, especially in North America, due to perceived risk of antimicrobial resistance, although this concern is not supported by large clinical trials and meta-analyses.”
From The microbiome and critical illness (2016) · cites this paper as [97]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 288
- Authors
- Daneman, N., Sarwar, S., Fowler, R. A., & Cuthbertson, B. H.
- Affiliations
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Daneman, Nick
- Venue
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 328-341
- ISSN
- 1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128799206
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 22
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Keywords
- selective decontamination of the digestive tract, selective oropharyngeal decontamination, antimicrobial resistance, intensive care unit, critically ill patients, Gram-positive pathogens, Gram-negative bacilli, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, polymyxin resistance, aminoglycoside resistance, fluoroquinolone resistance, cephalosporin resistance
- MeSH terms
- Aminoglycosides, Amphotericin B, Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cephalosporins, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cross Infection, Decontamination, Digestive System, Enterobacteriaceae, Europe, Gentamicins, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Neomycin, Nystatin, Oropharynx, Polymyxins, Primary Prevention, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, South Africa, Tobramycin, United States, Vancomycin, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Disease Transmission, Infectious, Fluoroquinolones, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review