Cited by 142Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyInfectious Diseases and TuberculosisMycobacterium research and diagnosis

Exhaled Mycobacterium tuberculosis output and detection of subclinical disease by face-mask sampling: prospective observational studies

Open access
Williams, Caroline M, Abdulwhhab, Mohamad, Birring, Surinder S, De Kock, Elsabe, Garton, Natalie J, Townsend, Eleanor, Pareek, Manish, Al-Taie, Alaa +5 more·2020·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis remains a global health challenge, with early diagnosis key to its reduction. Face-mask sampling detects exhaled Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We aimed to investigate bacillary output from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and to assess the potential of face-mask sampling as a diagnostic method in active case-finding. METHODS: We did a 24-h longitudinal study in patients from three hospitals in Pretoria, South Africa, with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis. Patients underwent 1 h of face-mask sampling eight times over a 24-h period, with contemporaneous sputum sampling. M tuberculosis was detected by quantitative PCR. We also did an active case-finding pilot study in inhabitants of an informal settlement near Pretoria. We enrolled individuals with symptoms of tuberculosis on the WHO screening questionnaire. Participants provided sputum and face-mask samples that were tested with the molecular assay Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra. Sputum-negative and face-mask-positive individuals were followed up prospectively for 20 weeks by bronchoscopy, PET-CT, and further sputum analysis to validate the diagnosis. FINDINGS: Between Sept 22, 2015, and Dec 3, 2015, 78 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis were screened for the longitudinal study, of whom 24 completed the study (20 had HIV co-infection). M tuberculosis was detected in 166 (86%) of 192 face-mask samples and 38 (21%) of 184 assessable sputum samples obtained over a 24-h period. Exhaled M tuberculosis output showed no diurnal pattern and did not associate with cough frequency, sputum bacillary content, or chest radiographic disease severity. On May 16, 2018, 45 individuals were screened for the prospective active case-finding pilot study, of whom 20 had tuberculosis symptoms and were willing to take part. Eight participants were diagnosed prospectively with pulmonary tuberculosis, of whom six were exclusively face-mask positive at screening. Four of these participants (three of whom were HIV-positive) had normal findings on chest radiography but had treatment-responsive early tuberculosis-compatible lesions on PET-CT scans, with Xpert-positive sputum samples after 6 weeks. INTERPRETATION: Face-mask sampling offers a highly efficient and non-invasive method for detecting exhaled M tuberculosis, informing the presence of active infection both with greater consistency and at an earlier disease stage than with sputum samples. The approach shows potential for diagnosis and screening, particularly in difficult-to-reach communities. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, CARA (Council for At-Risk Academics), University of Leicester, the UK Medical Research Council, and the National Institute for Health Research. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30707-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 142

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. [2]Dowdy DW Basu S Andrews JR Is passive diagnosis enough? The impact of subclinical disease on diagnostic strategies for tuberculosis Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187 2013 543 551 23262515 PMC3733406
  2. [3]Parsons LM Somoskovi A Gutierrez C Laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis in resource-poor countries: challenges and opportunities Clin Microbiol Rev 24 2011 314 350 21482728 PMC3122496
  3. [5]Jones-Lopez EC Acuna-Villaorduna C Ssebidandi M Cough aerosols of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the prediction of incident tuberculosis disease in household contacts Clin Infect Dis 63 2016 10 20 27025837 PMC5006106
  4. [6]Tostmann A Kik SV Kalisvaart NA Tuberculosis transmission by patients with smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in a large cohort in the Netherlands Clin Infect Dis 47 2008 1135 1142 18823268
  5. [7]Xie YL Cronin WA Proschan M Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients who are nucleic acid amplification test negative Clin Infect Dis 67 2018 1653 1659 29697779 PMC6233677
  6. [9]Escombe AR Moore DA Gilman RH The infectiousness of tuberculosis patients coinfected with HIV PLoS Med 5 2008 e188 18798687 PMC2535657
  7. [10]Fennelly KP Jones-Lopez EC Ayakaka I Variability of infectious aerosols produced during coughing by patients with pulmonary tuberculosis Am J Respir Crit Care Med 186 2012 450 457 22798319 PMC3443801
  8. [11]Wurie FB Lawn SD Booth H Sonnenberg P Hayward AC Bioaerosol production by patients with tuberculosis during normal tidal breathing: implications for transmission risk Thorax 71 2016 549 554 26917579
  9. [12]Williams CM Cheah ES Malkin J Face mask sampling for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in expelled aerosols PLoS One 9 2014 e104921 PMC4133242 25122163
  10. [13]WHO Systematic screening for active tuberculosis: principles and recommendations https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/andle/10665/84971/9789241548601_eng.pdf?sequence=1 2013 25996015
  11. [14]Birring SS Fleming T Matos S Raj AA Evans DH Pavord ID The Leicester Cough Monitor: preliminary validation of an automated cough detection system in chronic cough Eur Respir J 31 2008 1013 1018 18184683
  12. [15]Ralph AP Ardian M Wiguna A A simple, valid, numerical score for grading chest x-ray severity in adult smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis Thorax 65 2010 863 869 20861290
  13. [16]Turapov O O'Connor BD Sarybaeva AA Phenotypically adapted Mycobacterium tuberculosis populations from sputum are tolerant to first-line drugs Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60 2016 2476 2483 26883695 PMC4808147
  14. [17]Reddy CA Beveridge TJ Breznak JA Marzluf GA Schmidt TM Snyder LR Methods for general and molecular microbiology 3rd edn. 2007 ASM Press Sterling
  15. [18]Akkerman OW van der Werf TS de Boer M Comparison of 14 molecular assays for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid J Clin Microbiol 51 2013 3505 3511 23966510 PMC3889726
  16. [19]Chae H Han SJ Kim SY Development of a one-step multiplex PCR assay for differential detection of major Mycobacterium species J Clin Microbiol 55 2017 2736 2751 28659320 PMC5648710
  17. [20]Chakravorty S Simmons AM Rowneki M The new Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: improving detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampin in an assay suitable for point-of-care testing mBio 8 2017 e00812 e00917 28851844 PMC5574709
  18. [21]Nikolayevskyy V Miotto P Pimkina E Utility of propidium monoazide viability assay as a biomarker for a tuberculosis disease Tuberculosis (Edinb) 95 2015 179 185 25534168
  19. [22]Sinha A Lee KK Rafferty GF Predictors of objective cough frequency in pulmonary sarcoidosis Eur Respir J 47 2016 1461 1471 26846840
  20. [23]Chan KK Ing AJ Laks L Cossa G Rogers P Birring SS Chronic cough in patients with sleep-disordered breathing Eur Respir J 35 2010 368 372 20123846
  21. [24]Patterson B Morrow C Singh V Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli in bio-aerosols from untreated TB patients Gates Open Res 1 2017 11 29355225 PMC5757796
  22. [25]Jones-Lopez EC Namugga O Mumbowa F Cough aerosols of Mycobacterium tuberculosis predict new infection: a household contact study Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187 2013 1007 1015 23306539 PMC3707366
  23. [26]Turner RD Birring SS Darmalingam M Daily cough frequency in tuberculosis and association with household infection Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 22 2018 863 870 29991394
  24. [27]Fennelly KP Martyny JW Fulton KE Orme IM Cave DM Heifets LB Cough-generated aerosols of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a new method to study infectiousness Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169 2004 604 609 14656754
  25. [28]Bates JH Stead WW Effect of chemotherapy on infectiousness of tuberculosis N Engl J Med 290 1974 459 460 4811023
  26. [29]Fennelly KP Jones-Lopez EC Quantity and quality of inhaled dose predicts immunopathology in tuberculosis Front Immunol 6 2015 313 26175730 PMC4484340
  27. [30]Pasipanodya JG McNabb SJ Hilsenrath P Pulmonary impairment after tuberculosis and its contribution to TB burden BMC Public Health 10 2010 259 20482835 PMC2894771
  28. [31]Kennedy M Ramsheh MY Williams CML Face mask sampling reveals antimicrobial resistance genes in exhaled aerosols from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy volunteers BMJ Open Respir Res 5 2018 e000321 PMC6157532 30271606

Authors
Williams, C. M., Abdulwhhab, M., Birring, S. S., De Kock, E., Garton, N. J., Townsend, E., Pareek, M., Al-Taie, A., Pan, J., Ganatra, R., Stoltz, A. C., Haldar, P., & Barer, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
Williams, Caroline M
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
607-617
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008522998
Cited by
142
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (107302/Z/15/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P023061/1)
  • Cara
  • University of Leicester
  • National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Keywords
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, subclinical tuberculosis, active case finding, tuberculosis screening, smear-negative tuberculosis, HIV coinfection, Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra, non-invasive diagnosis, PET/CT, informal settlements, early detection of tuberculosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Masks, Middle Aged, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Prospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, South Africa, Sputum, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, HIV Infections, Young Adult, Coinfection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review