An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time
Open accessAbstract
In December, 2019, a local outbreak of pneumonia of initially unknown cause was detected in Wuhan (Hubei, China), and was quickly determined to be caused by a novel coronavirus,1 namely severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The outbreak has since spread to every province of mainland China as well as 27 other countries and regions, with more than 70 000 confirmed cases as of Feb 17, 2020.2 In response to this ongoing public health emergency, we developed an online interactive dashboard, hosted by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, to visualise and track reported cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in real time.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The statistical analysis includes all countries that enjoy at least some degree of functional and/or formal sovereignty as defined by V-Dem, except 5 excluded for lack of confirmed COVID-19 data.
“efforts have been made to include all countries that enjoy at least some degree of functional and/or formal sovereignty as defined by the V-Dem Institute (Coppedge et al. 2021). Out of these 178 countries, 5 must be excluded since they lack the necessary data on confirmed COVID-19 cases reported by the Johns Hopkins University 3 (Dong et al. 2020).”
From Precaution and proportionality in pandemic politics: democracy, state capacity, and COVID-19-related school closures around the world (2022) · cites this paper as Dong et al. 2020
The paper’s main text (page unavailable) identifies the Johns Hopkins dashboard as a source of confirmed COVID-19 case counts for affected countries. It does not discuss the citing study’s 178-country sample or establish that five countries had to be excluded for lack of data. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 10,048
- Authors
- Dong, E., Du, H., & Gardner, L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gardner, Lauren
- Venue
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 533-534
- ISSN
- 1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7159018
- OpenAlex
- W3008443627
- Cited by
- 10,048
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 138 · 2025: 262 · 2024: 607 · 2023: 1270 · 2022: 2155 · 2021: 3166 · 2020: 2430 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 359.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2020-09-01)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Johns Hopkins University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, interactive dashboard, data visualization, disease surveillance, outbreak surveillance
- MeSH terms
- Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Patient Identification Systems, Pneumonia, Viral, Time Factors, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics, Web Browser
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review