Cited by 187Pain Management and Placebo EffectTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The placebo effect in neurological disorders

de la Fuente-Fernández, Raúl, Schulzer, Michael, Stoessl, A Jon·2002·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the placebo effect is mediated by the dopaminergic reward mechanisms in the human brain and that it is related to the expectation of clinical benefit. On the basis of this theory, we propose some criteria for the proper investigation of the placebo effect, and review the evidence for a placebo effect in Parkinson's disease, depression, pain, and other neurological disorders. We also discuss the evidence for the use of placebos in long-term substitution programmes for the treatment of drug addiction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00038-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The context surrounding treatment delivery can allow placebo effects to improve care benefits.

    “There is an increasing body of literature suggesting that placebo effects can enhance the therapeutic benefits of care through the context in which the treatment is administered (Brody and Miller, 2011; Cleophas, 1995; de la Fuente-fernandex et al., 2002; Di Blasi et al., 2001; Finniss et al., 2010; Kaptchuk, 1998; Price et al., 2008; Thomas, 1994).”

    From Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects (2015) · cites this paper as de la Fuente-fernandex et al., 2002

  • Placebo administration with expectation of pain relief can be regarded as a specific form of reward processing that recruits activity in reward regions such as the striatum.

    “Results from recent studies suggest that placebo administration with expectation of pain relief can be regarded as a specific form of reward processing that recruits activity in reward regions such as the striatum (Benedetti, 2009; de la Fuente-fernandex et al., 2002; Leknes et al., 2011; Petrovic et al., 2005; Schweinhardt et al., 2009; Scott et al., 2007).”

    From Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects (2015) · cites this paper as de la Fuente-fernandex et al., 2002

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 187

Authors
de la Fuente-Fernández, R., Schulzer, M., & Stoessl, A. J.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Stoessl, A Jon
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-06
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
85-91
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138065855
Cited by
187
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
placebo effect, Parkinson's disease, depression, pain, neurological disorders, drug addiction
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Reward, Placebo Effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review