Cited by 371Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Computer-assisted imaging to assess brain structure in healthy and diseased brains

Ashburner, John, Csernansk, John G, Davatzikos, Christos, Fox, Nick C, Frisoni, Giovanni B, Thompson, Paul M·2003·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Neuroanatomical structures may be profoundly or subtly affected by the interplay of genetic and environmental factors, age, and disease. Such effects are particularly true in healthy ageing individuals and in those who have neurodegenerative diseases. The ability to use imaging to identify structural brain changes associated with different neurodegenerative disease states would be useful for diagnosis and treatment. However, early in the progression of such diseases, neuroanatomical changes may be too mild, diffuse, or topologically complex to be detected by simple visual inspection or manually traced measurements of regions of interest. Computerised methods are being developed that can capture the extraordinary morphological variability of the human brain. These methods use mathematical models sensitive to subtle changes in the size, position, shape, and tissue characteristics of brain structures affected by neurodegenerative diseases. Neuroanatomical features can be compared within and between groups of individuals, taking into account age, sex, genetic background, and disease state, to assess the structural basis of normality and disease. In this review, we describe the strengths and limitations of algorithms of existing computer-assisted tools at the most advanced stage of development, together with available and foreseeable evidence of their usefulness at the clinical and research level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00304-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cortical pattern matching was used to better localize cortical differences over time and increase the power to detect systematic changes.

    “An image-analysis technique known as cortical pattern matching (25–27) was used to better localize cortical differences over time and increase the power to detect systematic changes (25).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 371

Authors
Ashburner, J., Csernansk, J. G., Davatzikos, C., Fox, N. C., Frisoni, G. B., & Thompson, P. M.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli (IT)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Frisoni, Giovanni B
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
79-88
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152839913
Cited by
371
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-93-07, R01 AG 14971, R01AG014971)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH062130, MH62130, MH/AG 60883, P20 MH/DA52176)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS38753, R01NS038753)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM/MH05639)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR013642, P41 RR13642)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
neurodegenerative diseases, healthy aging, brain morphometry, automated brain segmentation, brain shape analysis, brain structural changes, disease diagnosis, genetic and environmental factors
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Brain Diseases, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Disease Progression, Neurodegenerative Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review