Genetics of multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is probably aetiologically heterogeneous. Systematic genetic epidemiological and molecular genetic studies have provided important insights. Both genetic and non-genetic (environment, stochastic) factors may be involved in susceptibility as well as outcome, but we have yet to understand their relative roles. Any environmental factor is likely to be ubiquitous and act on a population-basis rather than within the family microenvironment. Taken together, the results of genome screening studies provide strong evidence for exclusion of a major locus in MS. There are, however, many genes that seem to be associated with MS. These include, but are in no way limited to, HLA classes I and II, T-cell receptor beta, CTLA4, ICAM1, and SH2D2A. The future of MS genetics, as for most common complex disorders, will be dependent on the resources available, ranging from biological samples and comprehensive databases of clinical and epidemiological information to the development of new technologies and statistical methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Candidate gene studies in multiple sclerosis produced inconsistent findings.
“Candidate gene studies in cohorts of tens or hundreds of individuals at the loci encoding T‐cell receptor alpha12, 13 and beta14, 15 loci, the immunoglobulin heavy‐chain genes16, 17 and the gene for myelin basic protein,18, 19 among others, produced inconsistent findings.20, 21”
From Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis (2018) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 128 · Cited by 563
- Authors
- Dyment, D. A., Ebers, G. C., & Dessa Sadovnick, A.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-110
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161929126
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 128
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, genetic susceptibility, HLA class I and II, T cell receptor beta, CTLA-4, ICAM-1, environmental risk factors, disease outcome, genome-wide association study
- MeSH terms
- Antigens, Differentiation, Female, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Risk Factors, Antigens, CD, Genes, T-Cell Receptor beta, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, CTLA-4 Antigen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review