Is autism a disconnection disorder?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Models of ASD as a brain dysconnection syndrome have emerged from analyses of abnormalities in cortico-cortical connections.
“Models of ASD as a brain dysconnection syndrome (8-13) have emerged from analyses of abnormalities in cortico-cortical connections.”
From Aberrant Striatal Functional Connectivity in Children with Autism (2011) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 139
- Authors
- Frith, C.
- Affiliations
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Frith, Chris
- ORCID
- Frith, Chris
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 577
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041089391
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome, brain abnormalities, autism genetics
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Autistic Disorder, Humans, Language, Nerve Net
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
