Rapid detection of major depression in epilepsy: a multicentre study
Abstract
Background Depression is a common comorbid disorder in epilepsy but is not routinely assessed in neurology clinics. We aimed to create a rapid yet accurate screening instrument for major depression in people with epilepsy.Methods We developed a set of 46 items to identify symptoms of depression that do not overlap with common comorbid cognitive deficits or adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs. This preliminary instrument and several reliable and valid instruments for diagnosis of depression on the basis of criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV, depression symptom severity, health status, and toxic effects of medication were applied to 205 adult outpatients with epilepsy. We used discriminant function analysis to identify the most efficient set of items for classification of major depression, which we termed the neurological disorders depression inventory for epilepsy (NDDI-E). Baseline data for 229 demographically similar patients enrolled in two other clinical studies were used for verification of the original observations.Findings The discriminant function model for the NDDI-E included six items. Internal consistency reliability of the NDDI-E was 0.85 and test-retest reliability was 0.78. An NDDI-E score of more than 15 had a specificity of 90%, sensitivity of 81%, and positive predictive value of 0.62 for a diagnosis of major depression. Logistic regression showed that the model of association of major depression and the NDDI-E was not affected by adverse effects of antiepileptic medication, whereas models for depression and generic screening instruments were. The severity of depression symptoms and toxic effects of drugs independently correlated with subjective health status, explaining 72% of variance. Results from a separate verification sample also showed optimum sensitivity, specificity, and predictive power at a cut score of more than 15.Interpretation Major depression in people with epilepsy can be identified by a brief set of symptoms that can be differentiated from common adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs. The NDDI-E could enable rapid detection and improve management of depression in epilepsy in accordance with internationally recognised guidelines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The treatment effect sizes seen in this service evaluation were similar to those in other studies using a similar therapeutic approach.
“the treatment effect sizes seen in our service evaluation were similar to the those in other studies using a similar therapeutic approach [49]”
From A prospective service evaluation of acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with refractory epilepsy (2015) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 712
- Authors
- Gilliam, F. G., Barry, J. J., Hermann, B. P., Meador, K. J., Vahle, V., & Kanner, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- University of Wisconsin System (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gilliam, Frank G
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 399-405
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145562284
- Cited by
- 712
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 20.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- GlaxoSmithKline
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS40808, K24NS047551, NS047551, R01NS040808)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, epilepsy, depression screening, NDDI-E, antiepileptic drug adverse effects, comorbidities, health status, diagnostic accuracy, discriminant function analysis, questionnaire development
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anticonvulsants, Major Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Epilepsy, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review