Cited by 458Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Plasma Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 and the risk of dementia: a prospective case-cohort study

van Oijen, Marieke, Hofman, Albert, Soares, Holly D, Koudstaal, Peter J, Breteler, Monique MB·2006·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background Amyloid beta peptides (Abeta) are important components of plaques in Alzheimer's disease. Plasma concentrations of Abeta(1-40) and Abeta(1-42) rise with age and are increased in people with mutations that cause early-onset Alzheimer's disease. However, Abeta(1-42) concentrations may decrease early in the dementia process. We postulated that concentrations of Abeta(1-40) and Abeta(1-42) in plasma are associated with risk of dementia. Methods We did a case-cohort study embedded in the prospective, population-based Rotterdam Study. Of 6713 participants at risk for dementia, a random sample of 1756 people was drawn. During follow-up (mean 8.6 years), 392 incident dementia cases were identified. We investigated the association between plasma Abeta concentrations and risk of dementia and its subtypes using Cox proportional hazard models. Findings High concentrations of Abeta(1-40) but not Abeta(1-42) at baseline were associated with an increased risk of dementia. Compared with the first quartile of Abeta(1-40), age and sex-adjusted hazard ratios for dementia for the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 1.07 (95% CI 0.72-1.58), 1.16 (0.78-1.70), and 1.46 (1.01-2.12). People with an increased Abeta(1-42)/Abeta(1-40) ratio had a reduced risk of dementia. Compared with the first quartile of the Abeta(1-42)/Abeta(1-40) ratio, hazard ratios for the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 0.74 (0.53-1.02), 0.62 (0.44-0.88), and 0.47 (0.33-0.67). Associations were similar f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70501-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 458

Authors
van Oijen, M., Hofman, A., Soares, H. D., Koudstaal, P. J., & Breteler, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Breteler, Monique MB
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
5
Issue
8
Pages
655-660
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087574229
Cited by
458
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 33
FWCI
23.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Aβ40, amyloid-beta 42, plasma amyloid-beta, dementia risk, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, Rotterdam Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Dementia, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Peptide Fragments, Risk, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Proportional Hazards Models, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review