Plasma Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 and the risk of dementia: a prospective case-cohort study
Abstract
Background Amyloid beta peptides (Abeta) are important components of plaques in Alzheimer's disease. Plasma concentrations of Abeta(1-40) and Abeta(1-42) rise with age and are increased in people with mutations that cause early-onset Alzheimer's disease. However, Abeta(1-42) concentrations may decrease early in the dementia process. We postulated that concentrations of Abeta(1-40) and Abeta(1-42) in plasma are associated with risk of dementia. Methods We did a case-cohort study embedded in the prospective, population-based Rotterdam Study. Of 6713 participants at risk for dementia, a random sample of 1756 people was drawn. During follow-up (mean 8.6 years), 392 incident dementia cases were identified. We investigated the association between plasma Abeta concentrations and risk of dementia and its subtypes using Cox proportional hazard models. Findings High concentrations of Abeta(1-40) but not Abeta(1-42) at baseline were associated with an increased risk of dementia. Compared with the first quartile of Abeta(1-40), age and sex-adjusted hazard ratios for dementia for the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 1.07 (95% CI 0.72-1.58), 1.16 (0.78-1.70), and 1.46 (1.01-2.12). People with an increased Abeta(1-42)/Abeta(1-40) ratio had a reduced risk of dementia. Compared with the first quartile of the Abeta(1-42)/Abeta(1-40) ratio, hazard ratios for the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 0.74 (0.53-1.02), 0.62 (0.44-0.88), and 0.47 (0.33-0.67). Associations were similar f…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical studies showed that increased levels of plasma Aβ40, but not Aβ42, significantly correlate with a heightened risk of AD.
“Also, clinical studies showed that increased levels of plasma Aβ40, but not Aβ42, significantly correlate with a heightened risk of AD (51,52, 53,54).”
From Alzheimer's Disease–Associated Amyloid-β Precursor Protein Prevents Aging Stress–Induced Mitophagy and Fumarate Depletion to Improve Antitumor Immunity (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 458
- Authors
- van Oijen, M., Hofman, A., Soares, H. D., Koudstaal, P. J., & Breteler, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Breteler, Monique MB
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 655-660
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087574229
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 23.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- Aβ40, amyloid-beta 42, plasma amyloid-beta, dementia risk, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, Rotterdam Study
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Dementia, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Peptide Fragments, Risk, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Proportional Hazards Models, Amyloid beta-Peptides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review