Cited by 193Lysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchMetabolism and Genetic DisordersVirus-based gene therapy research

Survival analysis of haematopoietic cell transplantation for childhood cerebral X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy: a comparison study

Mahmood, Asif, Raymond, Gerald V, Dubey, Prachi, Peters, Charles, Moser, Hugo W·2007·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background Favourable outcomes have been reported for patients with childhood cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (CCALD) who had received haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) at the early stage of cerebral involvement. However, comparative data for non-transplanted CCALD patients are limited. We analysed survival of CCALD patients who had not received HCT and, in a subgroup with early cerebral disease, compared survival in those who underwent HCT with those who did not. Methods Retrospective survival analyses were done on 283 CCALD patients identified at the Kennedy Krieger Institute who had not received HCT, focusing on a 30-member early stage cerebral subgroup whose neurological disability and MRI severity scores matched those in a 19-member transplanted subgroup previously reported. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were used for survival analysis and to estimate the difference between the survival probabilities of the groups with statistical significance set at alpha=0.05. Findings Mean age at onset of symptoms in the entire 283 non-transplanted group was 7 years (SD 2 years). 131 (46%) patients died during the mean follow-up period of 5.9 years (5.3) at a mean age of 12.3 years (4.9). 5-year survival was 66%. The 5-year survival probability of 54% in the early stage group was significantly poorer (chi(2)=7.47, p=0.006) than the 5-year survival of 95% in the transplanted group with early stage cerebral disease. Interpretation HCT done in the early and progre…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70177-1

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahmood, A., Raymond, G. V., Dubey, P., Peters, C., & Moser, H. W.
Affiliations
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
  • MetroWest Medical Center (US)
  • Children's Mercy Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Raymond, Gerald V
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
687-692
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154923434
Cited by
193
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (M0-1-R00052)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD039276, HD39276)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy, X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy, haematopoietic cell transplantation, childhood cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy, survival, treatment timing, neurological deficit
MeSH terms
Adrenoleukodystrophy, Child, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Stem Cell Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review