Cited by 68

An international consensus classification for focal cortical dysplasias

Blümcke, Ingmar, Spreafico, Roberto·2011·The Lancet Neurology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70225-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All cases were reviewed independently by two neuropathologists and the diagnosis was confirmed according to the international consensus classification system for grading FCD.

    “All cases were reviewed independently by two neuropathologists and the diagnosis was confirmed according to the international consensus classification system recently proposed for grading FCD [23].”
  • Gangliogliomas and focal cortical dysplasia type IIb represent a major cause of drug-resistant epilepsy.

    “GG and FCD type IIb represent a major cause of drug-resistant epilepsy [23], [25] and are characterized by a prominent activation of various inflammatory pathways, including the TIR signaling pathway [9], [40]–[43].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blümcke, I., & Spreafico, R.
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
26-27
ISSN
1474-4422
Cited by
68
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review