Top ten research priorities relating to life after stroke
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Supporting psychological adjustment is the number one priority for Life After Stroke research in the UK.
“Supporting psychological adjustment is the number one priority for Life After Stroke research in the UK,1,2”
From Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS): Feasibility Testing of a Co-developed Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention to Support Psychological Adjustment After Stroke. (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
The top-ten list (Additional information; page not given) ranks improving cognition first and helping people come to terms with the long-term consequences of stroke second. Psychological adjustment is a research priority, but this paper does not rank it number one. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 273
- Authors
- Pollock, A., St George, B., Fenton, M., & Firkins, L.
- Affiliations
- Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pollock, Alex
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083208896
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 12.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Keywords
- stroke, life after stroke, research priorities, James Lind Alliance, patient and public involvement, research agenda setting, caregivers, healthcare workers
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Humans, Quality of Life, Research, Nursing Research, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
