Cited by 186Epilepsy research and treatmentPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesDiet and metabolism studies

Efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide versus controlled-release carbamazepine for newly diagnosed partial epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

Baulac, Michel, Brodie, Martin J, Patten, Anna, Segieth, Joanna, Giorgi, Luigi·2012·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background Additional options are needed for monotherapy treatment of adults newly diagnosed with partial epilepsy. This trial compares the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily zonisamide with twice-daily controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy for such patients. Methods In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial, adults from 120 centres in Asia, Australia, and Europe, aged 18-75 years and newly diagnosed with partial epilepsy, were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio, done with a computer-generated pseudorandom code) to receive zonisamide or carbamazepine. Patients, investigators, and sponsor personnel giving drugs, analysing outcomes, and interpreting data were masked to treatment allocation. After treatment initiation (zonisamide 100 mg/day vs carbamazepine 200 mg/day [given in two doses]) and up-titration (to 300 mg/day vs 600 mg/day), patients entered a 26-78 weeks flexible-dosing period (200-500 mg/day vs 400-1200 mg/day, according to response and tolerance). Once patients were seizure-free for 26 weeks they entered a 26-week maintenance phase. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 26 weeks or more in the per-protocol population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00477295. Findings 583 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (282 zonisamide, 301 carbamazepine), of whom 456 were analysed for the primary endpoint (per-protocol population: 223 zo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70105-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baulac, M., Brodie, M. J., Patten, A., Segieth, J., & Giorgi, L.
Affiliations
  • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
  • Western Infirmary (GB)
  • Eisai (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
579-588
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075552514
Cited by
186
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UCB Pharma
  • Novartis
  • Cilag
  • Medtronic
  • European Commission
  • Pfizer
  • Eisai
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Ipsen
  • Viropharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
Keywords
zonisamide, focal epilepsy, newly diagnosed epilepsy, monotherapy, seizure freedom, antiepileptic drugs, non-inferiority, treatment-emergent adverse events, tolerability, flexible dosing, dose titration, maintenance phase, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Zonisamide, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anticonvulsants, Carbamazepine, Delayed-Action Preparations, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Epilepsies, Partial, Female, Humans, Isoxazoles, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review