Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 545

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The natural history of multiple system atrophy: a prospective European cohort study

Open access
Wenning, Gregor K, Geser, Felix, Krismer, Florian, Seppi, Klaus, Duerr, Susanne, Boesch, Sylvia, Köllensperger, Martin, Goebel, Georg, Pfeiffer, Karl P, Barone, Paolo, Pellecchia, Maria Teresa, Quinn, Niall P, Koukouni, Vasiliki, Fowler, Clare J, Schrag, Anette, Mathias, Christopher J, Giladi, Nir, Gurevich, Tanya, Dupont, Erik, Ostergaard, Karen, Nilsson, Christer F, Widner, Håkan, Oertel, Wolfgang, Eggert, Karla Maria, Albanese, Alberto, del Sorbo, Francesca, Tolosa, Eduardo, Cardozo, Adriana, Deuschl, Günther, Hellriegel, Helge, Klockgether, Thomas, Dodel, Richard, Sampaio, Cristina, Coelho, Miguel, Djaldetti, Ruth, Melamed, Eldad, Gasser, Thomas, Kamm, Christoph, Meco, Giuseppe, Colosimo, Carlo, Rascol, Olivier, Meissner, Wassilios G, Tison, François, Poewe, Werner·2013·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a fatal and still poorly understood degenerative movement disorder that is characterised by autonomic failure, cerebellar ataxia, and parkinsonism in various combinations. Here we present the final analysis of a prospective multicentre study by the European MSA Study Group to investigate the natural history of MSA. METHODS: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of MSA were recruited and followed up clinically for 2 years. Vital status was ascertained 2 years after study completion. Disease progression was assessed using the unified MSA rating scale (UMSARS), a disease-specific questionnaire that enables the semiquantitative rating of autonomic and motor impairment in patients with MSA. Additional rating methods were applied to grade global disease severity, autonomic symptoms, and quality of life. Survival was calculated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis and predictors were identified in a Cox regression model. Group differences were analysed by parametric tests and non-parametric tests as appropriate. Sample size estimates were calculated using a paired two-group t test. FINDINGS: 141 patients with moderately severe disease fulfilled the consensus criteria for MSA. Mean age at symptom onset was 56·2 (SD 8·4) years. Median survival from symptom onset as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 9·8 years (95% CI 8·1-11·4). The parkinsonian variant of MSA (hazard ratio [HR] 2·08, 95% CI 1·09-3·97; p=0·026) and incomplete bladder emptying (HR 2·10, 1·02-4·30; p=0·044) predicted shorter survival. 24-month progression rates of UMSARS activities of daily living, motor examination, and total scores were 49% (9·4 [SD 5·9]), 74% (12·9 [8·5]), and 57% (21·9 [11·9]), respectively, relative to baseline scores. Autonomic symptom scores progressed throughout the follow-up. Shorter symptom duration at baseline (OR 0·68, 0·5-0·9; p=0·006) and absent levodopa response (OR 3·4, 1·1-10·2; p=0·03) predicted rapid UMSARS progression. Sample size estimation showed that an interventional trial with 258 patients (129 per group) would be able to detect a 30% effect size in 1-year UMSARS motor examination decline rates at 80% power. INTERPRETATION: Our prospective dataset provides new insights into the evolution of MSA based on a follow-up period that exceeds that of previous studies. It also represents a useful resource for patient counselling and planning of multicentre trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70327-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 545

Metadata

Authors
Wenning, G. K., Geser, F., Krismer, F., Seppi, K., Duerr, S., Boesch, S., Köllensperger, M., Goebel, G., Pfeiffer, K. P., Barone, P., Pellecchia, M. T., Quinn, N. P., Koukouni, V., Fowler, C. J., Schrag, A., Mathias, C. J., Giladi, N., Gurevich, T., Dupont, E., Ostergaard, K., Nilsson, C. F., Widner, H., Oertel, W., Eggert, K. M., Albanese, A., del Sorbo, F., Tolosa, E., Cardozo, A., Deuschl, G., Hellriegel, H., Klockgether, T., Dodel, R., Sampaio, C., Coelho, M., Djaldetti, R., Melamed, E., Gasser, T., Kamm, C., Meco, G., Colosimo, C., Rascol, O., Meissner, W. G., Tison, F., & Poewe, W.
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
264-274
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125766898
Cited by
545
References
4
FWCI
26.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The natural history of multiple system atrophy: a prospective European cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70327-7
The paper
Wenning, G. K., Geser, F., Krismer, F., Seppi, K., Duerr, S., Boesch, S., Köllensperger, M., Goebel, G., Pfeiffer, K. P., Barone, P., Pellecchia, M. T., Quinn, N. P., Koukouni, V., Fowler, C. J., Schrag, A., Mathias, C. J., Giladi, N., Gurevich, T., Dupont, E., . . . Poewe, W. (2013). The natural history of multiple system atrophy: a prospective European cohort study. The Lancet Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70327-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.