Lithium in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (LiCALS): a phase 3 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Lithium has neuroprotective effects in cell and animal models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and a small pilot study in patients with ALS showed a significant effect of lithium on survival. We aimed to assess whether lithium improves survival in patients with ALS. METHODS: The lithium carbonate in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (LiCALS) trial is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral lithium taken daily for 18 months in patients with ALS. Patients aged at least 18 years who had ALS according to the revised El Escorial criteria, had disease duration between 6 and 36 months, and were taking riluzole were recruited from ten centres in the UK. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either lithium or matched placebo tablets. Randomisation was via an online system done at the level of the individual by block randomisation with randomly varying block sizes, stratified by study centre and site of disease onset (limb or bulbar). All patients and assessing study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the rate of survival at 18 months and was analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with Eudract, number 2008-006891-31. FINDINGS: Between May 26, 2009, and Nov 10, 2011, 243 patients were screened, 214 of whom were randomly assigned to receive lithium (107 patients) or placebo (107 patients). Two patients discontinued treatment and one died before the target therapeutic lithium concentration could be achieved. 63 (59%) of 107 patients in the placebo group and 54 (50%) of 107 patients in the lithium group were alive at 18 months. The survival functions did not differ significantly between groups (Mantel-Cox log-rank χ(2) on 1 df=1·64; p=0·20). After adjusting for study centre and site of onset using logistic regression, the relative odds of survival at 18 months (lithium vs placebo) was 0·71 (95% CI 0·40-1·24). 56 patients in the placebo group and 61 in the lithium group had at least one serious adverse event. INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence of benefit of lithium on survival in patients with ALS, but nor were there safety concerns, which had been identified in previous studies with less conventional designs. This finding emphasises the importance of pursuing adequately powered trials with clear endpoints when testing new treatments. FUNDING: The Motor Neurone Disease Association of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite early enthusiasm over lithium in patients and mouse models, five subsequent trials showed no clinical benefit in survival or neuromuscular outcomes for ALS patients.
“Despite early enthusiasm over lithium in patients and mouse models [505,506], five subsequent trials showed no clinical benefit in survival or neuromuscular outcomes for ALS patients [507–511].”
From Autophagy and ALS: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications (2022) · cites this paper as [510]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 132
- Authors
- ‡
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- ‡
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 339-345
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3610091
- OpenAlex
- W2098237643
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 11.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10082)
- Motor Neurone Disease Association (LEIGH/RF/JUL08/6345, TURNER/JAN13/944-795)
- King's College London
- Medical Research Council (MR/K01014X/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
- Keywords
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, lithium, lithium carbonate, survival, neuroprotection, riluzole, disease-modifying therapy, serious adverse events, bulbar onset, limb onset, drug efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Survival Rate, Lithium Carbonate, Treatment Outcome, Neuroprotective Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review