The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (STASH): a multicentre randomised phase 3 trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefit of statins in patients with acute aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage is unclear. We aimed to determine whether simvastatin 40 mg could improve the long-term outcome in patients with this disorder. METHODS In this international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial, we enrolled patients aged 18-65 years with confirmatory evidence of an aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and presenting less than 96 h from ictus from 35 acute neurosurgical centres in nine countries. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either simvastatin 40 mg or placebo once a day for up to 21 days. We used a computer-generated randomisation code to randomise patients in every centre by blocks of ten (five simvastatin, five placebo). Participants and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score obtained by questionnaire at 6 months. Analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. This trial has been completed and is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN75948817. FINDINGS Between Jan 6, 2007, and Feb 1, 2013, apart from the period between May 15, 2009, and Feb 8, 2011, when recruitment was on hold, 803 patients were randomly assigned to receive either simvastatin 40 mg (n=391) or placebo (n=412). All patients were included in the intention-to-treat population. 782 (97%) patients had outcome data recorded at 6 months, of whom 560 (72%) were classed as having a favourable outcome, mRS 0-2 (271 patients in the simvastatin group vs 289 in the placebo group). The primary ordinal analysis of the mRS, adjusted for age and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade on admission, gave a common odds ratio (OR) of 0·97, 95% CI 0·75-1·25; p=0·803. At 6 months, we recorded 37 (10%) deaths in the simvastatin group compared with 35 (9%) in the placebo group (log-rank p=0·592). 70 (18%) serious adverse events were reported in the simvastatin group compared with 74 (18%) in the placebo group. No suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions were reported. INTERPRETATION The STASH trial did not detect any benefit in the use of simvastatin for long-term or short-term outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Despite demonstrating no safety concerns, we conclude that patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage should not be treated routinely with simvastatin during the acute stages. FUNDING British Heart Foundation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with Hypercholesterolemia
Shepherd, J., Cobbe, S. M., Ford, I., Isles, C. G., Lorimer, A. R., Macfarlane, P. W., McKillop, J. H., & Packard, C. J. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199511163332001 · Cited by 7,449
PREVENTION OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE WITH PRAVASTATIN IN MEN WITH HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA
Hepherd, J. A. S., Obbe, S. T. M. C., Ord, I. A. F., Sles, C. H. G. I., Orimer, A. R. O. L., Acfarlane, P. E. W. M., Illop, J. A. H. M. C. K., Ackard, C. H. J. P., & Roup, S. T. G. (1995) · Cited by 3,453
Molyneux, A. J., Kerr, R. S., Yu, L.-M., Clarke, M., Sneade, M., Yarnold, J. A., & Sandercock, P. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67214-5 · Cited by 2,886
Feigin, V. L., Lawes, C. M., Bennett, D. A., Barker-Collo, S. L., & Parag, V. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70025-0 · Cited by 2,855
van Gijn, J., Kerr, R. S., & Rinkel, G. J. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60153-6 · Cited by 1,677
Subarachnoid haemorrhage: diagnosis, causes and management
van Gijn, J., & Rinkel, G. J. E. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.2.249 · Cited by 1,353
Pickard, J. D., Murray, G. D., Illingworth, R. D., Shaw, M. D. M., Teasdale, G. M., Foy, P. M., Humphrey, P. R. D., Lang, D. A., Nelson, R. J., Richards, P., et al. (1989) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.298.6674.636 · Cited by 1,144
Self-citationDelayed neurological deterioration after subarachnoid haemorrhage
Macdonald, R. L. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.246 · Cited by 887
Macdonald, R. L., Higashida, R. T., Keller, E., Mayer, S. A., Molyneux, A., Raabe, A., Vajkoczy, P., Wanke, I., Bach, D., Frey, A., et al. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70108-9 · Cited by 644
Cited by
Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage
Francoeur, C. L., & Mayer, S. A. (2016) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1447-6 · Cited by 388
The role of the nitric oxide pathway in brain injury and its treatment — From bench to bedside
Garry, P. S., Ezra, M., Rowland, M. J., Westbrook, J., & Pattinson, K. T. S. (2015) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.10.017 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirkpatrick, P. J., Turner, C. L., Smith, C., Hutchinson, P. J., & Murray, G. D.
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 666-675
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171390015
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 17.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (STASH): a multicentre randomised phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70084-5
- The paper
- Kirkpatrick, P. J., Turner, C. L., Smith, C., Hutchinson, P. J., & Murray, G. D. (2014). Simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (STASH): a multicentre randomised phase 3 trial. The Lancet Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70084-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.