Cited by 18Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Membrane damage is at the core of Alzheimer's disease

Hardy, John·2017·The Lancet Neurology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30091-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hardy, J.
Affiliations
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Hardy, John
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
342
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2607311694
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Parkinson's UK (G-1307)
  • Rosetrees Trust
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K01417X/1, MR/L501542/1, MR/J004758/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, membrane damage, amyloid deposition, late-onset Alzheimer's disease, sporadic Alzheimer's disease, autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease, apolipoprotein E, genetic loci, pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Cell Membrane, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Neurons, Lipid Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review