Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel genes associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: diagnostic and clinical implications

Open access
Chia, Ruth, Chiò, Adriano, Traynor, Bryan J·2018·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Summary Background The disease course of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is rapid and, because its pathophysiology is unclear, few effective treatments are available. Genetic research aims to understand the underlying mechanisms of ALS and identify potential therapeutic targets. The first gene associated with ALS was SOD1, identified in 1993 and, by early 2014, more than 20 genes had been identified as causative of, or highly associated with, ALS. These genetic discoveries have identified key disease pathways that are therapeutically testable and could potentially lead to the development of better treatments for people with ALS. Recent developments Since 2014, seven additional genes have been associated with ALS (MATR3, CHCHD10, TBK1, TUBA4A, NEK1, C21orf2, and CCNF), all of which were identified by genome-wide association studies, whole genome studies, or exome sequencing technologies. Each of the seven novel genes code for proteins associated with one or more molecular pathways known to be involved in ALS. These pathways include dysfunction in global protein homoeostasis resulting from abnormal protein aggregation or a defect in the protein clearance pathway, mitochondrial dysfunction, altered RNA metabolism, impaired cytoskeletal integrity, altered axonal transport dynamics, and DNA damage accumulation due to defective DNA repair. Because these novel genes share common disease pathways with other genes implicated in ALS, therapeutics targeting these pathways could be useful for a broad group of patients stratified by genotype. However, the effects of these novel genes have not yet been investigated in animal models, which will be a key step to translating these findings into clinical practice. Where next? The identification of these seven novel genes has been important in unravelling the molecular mechanisms underlying ALS. However, our understanding of what causes ALS is not complete, and further genetic research will provide additional detail about its causes. Increased genetic knowledge will also identify potential therapeutic targets and could lead to the development of individualised medicine for patients with ALS. These developments will have a direct effect on clinical practice when genome sequencing becomes a routine and integral part of disease diagnosis and management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30401-5

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 68 references

Cited by

See all 573

Metadata

Authors
Chia, R., Chiò, A., & Traynor, B. J.
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
94-102
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769269450
Cited by
573
References
68
FWCI
26.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel genes associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: diagnostic and clinical implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30401-5
The paper
Chia, R., Chiò, A., & Traynor, B. J. (2018). Novel genes associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: diagnostic and clinical implications. The Lancet Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30401-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.