Remyelination in multiple sclerosis: From basic science to clinical translation
Open accessAbstract
The treatment of multiple sclerosis has been transformed by the successful development of immunotherapies that efficiently reduce disease activity and related clinical relapses during the relapsing-remitting phase of the disease. However, the prevention of disability progression, which is due to axonal and neuronal damage and loss, has yet to be achieved and is therapeutically challenging, particularly during the progressive phase of the disease. One strategy to counteract neurodegeneration is to promote neuroprotection by enhancing myelin regeneration, hence restoring nerve conduction and metabolic support to the axon. Animal studies have provided targets for interventions to improve brain and spinal cord remyelination, paving the way for the translation of this research to humans. From these initial and promising forays, further problems have emerged, including questions on how best to design these clinical trials and appropriately measure the outcomes. Solving these problems will need additional work before efficacious pro-remyelination therapies will be ready for people with multiple sclerosis, but there is a real sense of hope that researchers are getting closer to a successful therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Which cells are at the forefront of myelin regeneration is a matter of ongoing debate.
“Which cells are at the forefront of myelin regeneration is a matter of ongoing debate.44,45”
From BCAS1-positive oligodendrocytes enable efficient cortical remyelination in multiple sclerosis (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 120 · Cited by 350
- Authors
- Lubetzki, C., Zalc, B., Williams, A., Stadelmann, C., & Stankoff, B.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine (GB)
- Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Lubetzki, Catherine
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 678-688
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3043273384
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Neurology (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Deutschen Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft
- Fondation pour l'Aide à la Recherche sur la Sclérose en Plaques
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 2067/1- 390729940, STA 1389/5-1)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (ANR-10-IAIHU-06)
- Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
- National Multiple Sclerosis Society
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Keywords
- remyelination, multiple sclerosis, neuroprotection, neurodegeneration, disability progression, clinical trial design, outcome measurement, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, progressive multiple sclerosis
- MeSH terms
- Remyelination, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelin Sheath, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review